Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128382›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2022

Establishing Trust in Pharmaceutical Data with an Independent Verification and Validation Methodology.

Keith E Campbell, Taima Gomez, Elizabeth D Korte, Raja A Cholan, Greg Rehwoldt, Andrew K Sills, Christine Spisla, Traci Hindman Robinson, Philip J Meacham, Alicia Bracco and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Keith E CampbellU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.
Taima GomezDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Elizabeth D KorteDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Raja A CholanDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Greg RehwoldtDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Andrew K SillsDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Christine SpislaDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Traci Hindman RobinsonDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Philip J MeachamDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Alicia BraccoDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Peyton MarionDeloitte Consulting LLP Center for Health Informatics, Washington, DC.
Stephen M PowellSynensys LLC, Peachtree City, GA.
Diane MontellaU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.
Steven H BrownU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim is to demonstrate a general-purpose data and knowledge validation approach that enables reproducible metrics for data and knowledge quality and safety. We researched widely accepted statistical process control methods from high-quality, high-safety industries and applied them to pharmacy prescription data being migrated between EHRs. Natural language medication instructions from prescriptions were independently categorized by two terminologists as a first step toward encoding those medication instructions using standardized terminology. Overall, the weighted average of medication instructions that were matched by reviewers was 43%, with strong agreement between reviewers for short instructions (K=0.82) and long instructions (K=0.85), and moderate agreement for medium instructions (K=0.61). Category definitions will be refined in future work to mitigate discrepancies. We recommend incorporating appropriate statistical tests, such as evaluating inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and bivariate comparison of reviewer agreement over an adequate statistical sample, when developing benchmarks for health data and knowledge quality and safety.

Indexed as

PharmacyTrustBenchmarkingHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsReproducibility of ResultsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID37128382
PMCPMC10148340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.