Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128376›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2022

An Analysis of Speech during Life Saving Interventions to Inform the Design of a Computerized System for Delay Detection.

Katherine Zellner, Louis Jiorgio Villegas, Charles Neff, Waverly Getrich-Thompson, Randall Burd, Ivan Marsic, Aleksandra Sarcevic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine ZellnerDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Louis Jiorgio VillegasDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Charles NeffDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Waverly Getrich-ThompsonChildrens' National Hospital, Washington D.C., USA.
Randall BurdChildrens' National Hospital, Washington D.C., USA.
Ivan MarsicRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Aleksandra SarcevicDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe an analysis of speech during time-critical, team-based medical work and its potential to indicate process delays. We analyzed speech intention and sentence types during 39 trauma resuscitations with delays in one of three major lifesaving interventions: intravenous/intraosseous (IV/IO) line insertion, cardiopulmonary and resuscitation (CPR), and intubation. We found a significant difference in patterns of speech during delays vs. speech during non-delayed work. The speech intention during CPR delays, however, differed from the other LSIs, suggesting that context of speech must be considered. These findings will inform the design of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that will use multiple sensor modalities to alert medical teams to delays in real time. We conclude with design implications and challenges associated with speech-based activity recognition in complex medical processes.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationHumansInfusions, IntraosseousSpeech

Identifiers

PMID37128376
PMCPMC10148356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.