Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128271›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental sciences Europe2022

An assessment of requirements in investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to achieve the SDGs.

Walter Leal Filho, Diogo Guedes Vidal, Chen Chen, Maria Petrova, Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, Peter Yang, Steven Rogers, Lorena Álvarez-Castañón, Ilija Djekic, Ayyoob Sharifi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental sciences Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Promoting gender equality across the sustainable development goals.Environment, development and sustainability · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Walter Leal FilhoEuropean School of Sustainability Science and Research, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-8974
Diogo Guedes VidalCentre for Functional Ecology, TERRA Associate Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2777-2372
Chen ChenSchool of International Affairs and Public Administration and Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6377-2417
Maria PetrovaThe Earth Commons, Georgetown's Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Georgetown University, 3700 O St NW, Washington, DC 20057 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-9272
Maria Alzira Pimenta DinisUFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), University Fernando Pessoa (UFP), Praça 9 de Abril 349, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2198-6740
Peter YangCase Western Reserve University, 11112 Bellflower Road, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2933-7646
Steven RogersSchool of Geography, Geology, and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-5408
Lorena Álvarez-CastañónSocial Science and Humanities, University of Guanajuato, Lascuráin de Retana No. 5, Col. Centro, 3600 Guanajuato, Gto. México.ORCID 0000-0003-2512-8230
Ilija DjekicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, Zemun, 11080 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-8299
Ayyoob SharifiGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, and Network for Education and Research on Peace and Sustainability, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, 739-8530 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8983-8613
Samara NeivaGraduate Program in University Management, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Campus I-Roberto Sampaio Gonzaga, 274, Florianopilis, SC 88040-380 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5033-5958
Fernando Pessoa University · PTCase Western Reserve University · USGeorgetown University · USHiroshima University · JPKeele University · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBOcean University of China · CNUniversidad de Guanajuato · MXUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires much planning and the provision of resources, especially regarding the necessary investments, technologies and infrastructures needed. Yet, it is presently unclear how available these elements are, what gaps exist, what changes have taken place in terms of their availability since the adoption of the SDGs and what their requirements will be in the future. The knowledge gap has become even more concerning because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a bibliometric analysis, an assessment of the global progress of SDG implementation and requirements, identifying challenges through the development of a matrix, and a set of 11 case studies to triangulate the holistic analysis, an assessment of the global progress of the SDGs implementation and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on this process was carried out. Results: The findings suggest that the scope and width of resources limitation are currently undermining the implementation of the SDGs. Apart from the fact that the pace of progress has been insufficient, the potential of the SDGs in pursuing sustainability and improving life quality is not fully realised. This trend suggests that a substantial acceleration of the efforts is needed, especially for the five SDGs whose progress since 2015 has not been optimal, namely SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, while SDG3, SDG7, SDG9, SDG14, and SDG17 show signs of progress. The case studies showed that different industries have dissimilar effects on achieving the SDGs, with the food sector correlating with 15 SDGs, as opposed to the energy sector correlating with 6 SDGs. Accordingly, the priority level assessment in terms of achieving the SDGs, points to the need to further advance the above-mentioned five SDGs, i.e., 2, 11, 13, 15 and 16. Conclusions: This study fills in a knowledge gap in respect of the current need for and availability of investments, new technologies, and infrastructures to allow countries to pursue the SDGs. It is suggested that this availability is rather limited in specific contexts. In respect of the needs to be addressed, these include resource-related constraints, limited technologies and infrastructures, affecting SDG2, SDG11, SDG13, SDG15, and SDG16, whose progress needs to be enhanced. Since the global progress in the process of implementation of the SDGs depends directly and indirectly on addressing the resource gaps, it is suggested that this topic be further investigated, so that the present imbalances in the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental, be adequately addressed. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9.

Indexed as

Achievement of UN SDGsBibliometric analysisCase studiesInfrastructural challengesInvestment challengesTechnological challenges

Identifiers

PMID37128271
PMCPMC10127159
OpenAlexW4283750154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.