Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128267›Full record

ArticleJAAD international2023

Identifying risk factors for cutaneous disease among solid organ transplant recipients: A retrospective review.

Chelsea Shope, Laura Andrews, Mary Nan Leath, Courtney Linkous, Lara Wine Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAAD international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chelsea ShopeCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Laura AndrewsCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Mary Nan LeathCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Courtney LinkousCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Lara Wine LeeDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As solid organ transplant recipient (SOTR) life expectancy lengthens, the risk of developing other chronic diseases also increases. Objective: To determine the cutaneous pathologies for which SOTRs are at an increased risk. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of SOTRs seen by dermatology from January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2022. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Benjamini Hochberg-adjusted Results: Five hundred and thirty SOTRs were identified. Patients had cutaneous malignancy (38.3%), precancerous lesions (32.5%), inflammatory (35.5%), and infectious diseases (33.1%). Odds of precancerous lesions were higher with increased age at transplant (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; adjusted Limitations: This study is retrospective and was not able to capture patients seen by dermatology outside of our institution. Conclusions: SOTRs at risk of cutaneous lesions should be referred to dermatology because these conditions may place a significant burden on the quality of life.

Indexed as

immunosuppressioninfectiousinflammatoryorgan transplantprecancer

Identifiers

PMID37128267
PMCPMC10148151
OpenAlexW4321602279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.