Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128174›Full record

Observational studyJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Optimal rate control in dogs with atrial fibrillation-ORCA study-Multicenter prospective observational study: Prognostic impact and predictors of rate control.

Brigite Pedro, Antonia Mavropoulou, Mark A Oyama, Christopher Linney, João Neves, Joanna Dukes-McEwan, Ana P Fontes-Sousa, Anna R Gelzer

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyObservational Study, VeterinaryMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Brigite PedroWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, West Midlands, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3027-0020
Antonia MavropoulouPlakentia Veterinary Clinic, Athens, Greece.
Mark A OyamaDepartment of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5218-9226
Christopher LinneyWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, West Midlands, United Kingdom.
João NevesWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, West Midlands, United Kingdom.
Joanna Dukes-McEwanSmall Animal Teaching Hospital, Department of Small Animal Clinical Science, University of Liverpool Leahurst Campus, Neston, United Kingdom.
Ana P Fontes-SousaICBAS-UP, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Anna R GelzerDepartment of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7997-5374
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Pennsylvania · USAthens Orthopedic Clinic · USUniversity of Atlántico · COUniversity of Liverpool · GBWillows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service · GB

Funding

European College of Veterinary Internal Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal heart rate (HR) in dogs with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. Impact of HR on survival needs elucidation. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesDogs with a 24 hours Holter-derived meanHR ≤125 beats per minute (bpm; rate controlled) survive longer than dogs with higher meanHR. We further aimed to determine which variables predict ability to achieving rate control. ANIMALS: Sixty dogs with AF.

methodsHolter-derived meanHR, clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker variables were analyzed prospectively. Survival was recorded from time of rate control, with all-cause mortality as primary endpoint. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified variables independently associated with survival; Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the median survival time of dogs with meanHR ≤125 bpm vs >125 bpm. Logistic regression explored baseline variables associated with inability to achieve rate control.

resultsStructural heart disease was present in 56/60 dogs, 50/60 had congestive heart failure, and 45/60 died. Median time to all-cause death was 160 days (range, 88-303 days), dogs with meanHR >125 bpm (n = 27) lived 33 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 15-141 days), dogs with meanHR ≤125 bpm (n = 33) lived 608 days (95% CI, 155-880 days; P < .0001). Congenital heart disease and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were independently associated with higher risk of death (P < .01 and <.0001, respectively) whereas meanHR ≤125 bpm decreased the risk of death (P < .001). Increased left atrial size, increased C-reactive protein concentration and lower blood pressure at admission were associated with failure to achieve rate control. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Rate control affects survival; an optimal target meanHR <125 bpm should be sought in dogs with AF. Baseline patient variables can help predict if rate control is achievable.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationDog DiseasesHeart FailureAnimalsBiomarkersDogsHeart RatePrognosisBiomarkersarrhythmiabiomarkersechocardiographyHoltersurvival

Identifiers

PMID37128174
PMCPMC10229328
OpenAlexW4367668815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.