Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128081›Full record

ReviewNature food2020

Strategies to improve wheat for human health.

Brittany Hazard, Kay Trafford, Alison Lovegrove, Simon Griffiths, Cristobal Uauy, Peter Shewry

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature food, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. An elite allele TaDT1-ANature communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brittany HazardQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-0415
Kay TraffordNIAB, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-0311
Alison LovegroveRothamsted Research, Hertfordshire, UK.
Simon GriffithsJohn Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.
Cristobal UauyJohn Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-1770
Peter ShewryRothamsted Research, Hertfordshire, UK. peter.shewry@rothamsted.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-2517
John Innes Centre · GBRothamsted Research · GBNational Institute of Agricultural Botany · GBQuadram Institute · GB

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (BB/P016855/1)RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/P016855/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/R012512/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BBS/E/J/000PR9799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their economic importance and growing demand, concerns are emerging around wheat-based foods and human health. Most wheat-based foods are made from refined white flour rather than wholemeal flour, and the overconsumption of these products may contribute to the increasing global prevalence of chronic diseases, particularly type 2 diabetes and obesity. Here, we review how the amount, composition and interactions of starch and cell wall polysaccharides, the major carbohydrate components in refined wheat products, impact human health. We discuss strategies and challenges to manipulate these components for improved diet and health using newly developed wheat genomics tools and resources. Commercial foods developed from these novel approaches must be produced without adverse effects on cost, consumer acceptability and processing properties.

Identifiers

PMID37128081
OpenAlexW3048592561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.