Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127796›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2023

Type III Gustilo-Anderson open fracture does not justify routine prophylactic Gram-negative antibiotic coverage.

Takashi Suzuki, Takahiro Inui, Miyoshi Sakai, Keisuke Ishii, Taketo Kurozumi, Yoshinobu Watanabe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. State of orthopaedic trauma registries in South Korea, Japan, and Australia.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  9. Outcomes Associated with Choice of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Open Fractures.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Management of open fractures: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi SuzukiTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. takashisuzuki911@yahoo.co.jp.
Takahiro InuiTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Miyoshi SakaiDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke IshiiTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taketo KurozumiTrauma Center, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinobu WatanabeTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Teikyo University Hospital · JPTeikyo University · JPToranomon Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is common in open long bone fractures, so early administration of prophylactic antibiotics is critical to prevent SSI. However, the necessity of initial broad-spectrum coverage for Gram-positive and -negative pathogens remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics in a large, national-wide sample. We reviewed an open fracture database of prospectively collected data from 111 institutions managed by our society. A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare the rates of deep SSI between narrow- and broad-spectrum antibiotics, which were initiated within three hours after injury. A total of 1041 type III fractures were evaluated at three months after injury. Overall deep SSI rates did not differ significantly between the narrow-spectrum group (43/538, 8.0%) and broad-spectrum group (49/503, 9.8%) (p = 0.320). During propensity score-matched analysis, 425 pairs were analyzed. After matching, no significant difference in the SSI rate was seen between the narrow- and broad-spectrum groups, with 42 SSIs (9.9%) and 40 SSIs (9.4%), respectively (p = 0.816). The probability of deep SSI was not reduced by broad-spectrum antibiotics compared with narrow-spectrum antibiotics in type III open long bone fractures.

Indexed as

Fractures, OpenAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisHumansPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID37127796
PMCPMC10151338
OpenAlexW4367627151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.