Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127759›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2023

Semantic reconstruction of continuous language from non-invasive brain recordings.

Jerry Tang, Amanda LeBel, Shailee Jain, Alexander G Huth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Semantic encoding of trauma memories in the hippocampus among individuals with PTSD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Decoding concept representations in aphasia after stroke.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jerry TangDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Amanda LeBelDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7817-8851
Shailee JainDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7327-5492
Alexander G HuthDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. huth@cs.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5031-5348

Funding

CRCNS: Discovering Computational Principles of Language Processing in the BrainR01DC020088 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PESTILLI, FRANCO, WEHBE, LEILA · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A brain-computer interface that decodes continuous language from non-invasive recordings would have many scientific and practical applications. Currently, however, non-invasive language decoders can only identify stimuli from among a small set of words or phrases. Here we introduce a non-invasive decoder that reconstructs continuous language from cortical semantic representations recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Given novel brain recordings, this decoder generates intelligible word sequences that recover the meaning of perceived speech, imagined speech and even silent videos, demonstrating that a single decoder can be applied to a range of tasks. We tested the decoder across cortex and found that continuous language can be separately decoded from multiple regions. As brain-computer interfaces should respect mental privacy, we tested whether successful decoding requires subject cooperation and found that subject cooperation is required both to train and to apply the decoder. Our findings demonstrate the viability of non-invasive language brain-computer interfaces.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesSpeech PerceptionBrainBrain MappingLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingSemantics

Identifiers

PMID37127759
PMCPMC11304553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.