Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127711›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2023

Uncovering expression signatures of synergistic drug responses via ensembles of explainable machine-learning models.

Joseph D Janizek, Ayse B Dincer, Safiye Celik, Hugh Chen, William Chen, Kamila Naxerova, Su-In Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A deep profile of gene expression across 18 human cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Advancing cancer nanomedicine with machine learning.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph D JanizekPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ayse B DincerPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Safiye CelikRecursion Pharmaceuticals, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hugh ChenPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0549-4524
William ChenPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kamila Naxerova *Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. naxerova.kamila@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-5110
Su-In Lee *Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. suinlee@cs.washington.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5833-5215

Funding

PROJECT 4: Somatic evolution of the hematopoietic system in cardiovascular diseaseP01HL142494 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Matthias Nahrendorf · 2019 to 2026
$19.5M
Illuminating the evolutionary history of colorectal cancer metastasis: basic principles and clinical applicationsR37CA225655 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NAXEROVA, KAMILA · 2018 to 2024
$3.0M
Interpretable Machine Learning to Identify Alzheimer's Disease Therapeutic TargetsR01AG061132 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, SU-IN · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Opening the Black Box of Machine Learning ModelsR35GM128638 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, SU-IN · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA225655NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL142494NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061132NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning may aid the choice of optimal combinations of anticancer drugs by explaining the molecular basis of their synergy. By combining accurate models with interpretable insights, explainable machine learning promises to accelerate data-driven cancer pharmacology. However, owing to the highly correlated and high-dimensional nature of transcriptomic data, naively applying current explainable machine-learning strategies to large transcriptomic datasets leads to suboptimal outcomes. Here by using feature attribution methods, we show that the quality of the explanations can be increased by leveraging ensembles of explainable machine-learning models. We applied the approach to a dataset of 133 combinations of 46 anticancer drugs tested in ex vivo tumour samples from 285 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and uncovered a haematopoietic-differentiation signature underlying drug combinations with therapeutic synergy. Ensembles of machine-learning models trained to predict drug combination synergies on the basis of gene-expression data may improve the feature attribution quality of complex machine-learning models.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingMachine LearningHumansTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID37127711
PMCPMC11149694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.