Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127683›Full record

Trial reportTrials2023

Drainless robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy-randomized controlled trial (RESPECT).

B Müssle, J Kirchberg, N Buck, O Radulova-Mauersberger, D Stange, T Richter, B Müller-Stich, R Klotz, J Larmann, S Korn and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05553795 (Drainless Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05553795 naterminatednot on this map

Drainless Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnische Universität DresdenRan2023 to 2024Enrolled49ConditionsEsophageal CancerArmsEarly removal of chest drain, Chest drain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

B Müssle *Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
J Kirchberg *Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
N BuckDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
O Radulova-MauersbergerDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
D StangeDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
T RichterDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
B Müller-StichDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
R KlotzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
J LarmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
S KornDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
A KlimovaNational Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.
X GrählertCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
E TripsCoordination Centre for Clinical Trials, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
J WeitzDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
T WelschNational Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany. t.welsch@uke.de.
Heidelberg University · DETU Dresden · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

Heidelberger Zentrum für Personalisierte Onkologie Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum In Der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft DD04-NCTC-RespectHeidelberger Zentrum für Personalisierte Onkologie Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum In Der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft HD02-NCTC-Respect
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this randomized trial is to evaluate the early removal of postoperative drains after robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy (RAMIE). Evidence is lacking about feasibility, associated pain, recovery, and morbidity. METHODS/

designThis is a randomized controlled multicentric trial involving 72 patients undergoing RAMIE. Patients will be allocated into two groups. The "intervention" group consists of 36 patients. In this group, abdominal and chest drains are removed 3 h after the end of surgery in the absence of contraindications. The control group consists of 36 patients with conventional chest drain management. These drains are removed during the further postoperative course according to a standard algorithm. The primary objective is to investigate whether postoperative pain measured by NRS on the second postoperative day can be significantly reduced in the intervention group. Secondary endpoints are the intensity of pain during the first week, analgesic use, number of postoperative chest X-ray and CT scans, interventions, postoperative mobilization (steps per day as measured with an activity tracker), postoperative morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION: Until now, there have been no trials investigating different intraoperative chest drain strategies in patients undergoing RAMIE for oesophageal cancer with regard to perioperative complications until discharge. Minimally invasive approaches combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols lower morbidity but still include the insertion of chest drains. Reduction and early removal have been proposed after pulmonary surgery but not after RAMIE. The study concept is based on our own experience and the promising current results of the RAMIE procedure. Therefore, the presented randomized controlled trial will provide statistical evidence of the effectiveness and feasibility of the "drainless" RAMIE.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05553795. Registered on 23 September 2022.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsRoboticsAbdomenEsophagectomyHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery)Oesophageal cancerOesophagectomyPostoperative painRAMIE

Identifiers

PMID37127683
PMCPMC10152702
OpenAlexW4367627893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.