Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127657›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Effects of a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist for the prevention of recurrent acute pancreatitis: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (PAMORA-RAP trial).

Mathias E Cook, Cecilie S Knoph, Camilla A Fjelsted, Jens B Frøkjær, Anders E Bilgrau, Srdan Novovic, Maiken Thyregod Jørgensen, Michael B Mortensen, Liv B J Nielsen, Amer Hadi and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04966559 (Effects of a Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonist on Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis An Investigator-initiated, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04966559 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Effects of a Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonist on Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis An Investigator-initiated, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsbjørn Mohr DrewesRan2022 to 2024Enrolled74ConditionsPancreatitis, AcuteArmsPlacebo treatment, Naldemedine 0.2 MG Oral Tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Targeted therapeutics for pancreatitis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathias E CookDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre for Pancreatic Diseases and Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. m.cook@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-1091
Cecilie S KnophDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre for Pancreatic Diseases and Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Camilla A FjelstedDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre for Pancreatic Diseases and Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jens B FrøkjærDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anders E BilgrauDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Srdan NovovicCopenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Maiken Thyregod JørgensenDepartment of Surgery, Odense Pancreas Centre (OPAC), HPB Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Michael B MortensenDepartment of Surgery, Odense Pancreas Centre (OPAC), HPB Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Liv B J NielsenDigestive Disease Centre K, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amer HadiDigestive Disease Centre K, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mark Berner-HansenDigestive Disease Centre K, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Wiktor RutkowskiDepartment for Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Miroslav VujasinovicDepartment for Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Matthias LöhrDepartment for Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Asbjørn M DrewesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre for Pancreatic Diseases and Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Søren S OlesenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre for Pancreatic Diseases and Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. soso@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3916-3168
Aalborg University Hospital · DKKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKOdense University Hospital · DKAalborg University · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF190C0057331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute and chronic pancreatitis constitute a continuum of inflammatory disease of the pancreas with an increasing incidence in most high-income countries. A subset of patients with a history of pancreatitis suffer from recurrence of acute pancreatitis attacks, which accelerate disease progression towards end-stage chronic pancreatitis with loss of exocrine and endocrine function. There is currently no available prophylactic treatment for recurrent acute pancreatitis apart from removing risk factors, which is not always possible. Pain is the primary symptom of acute pancreatitis, which induces the endogenous release of opioids. This may further be potentiated by opioid administration for pain management. Increased exposure to opioids leads to potentially harmful effects on the gastrointestinal tract, including, e.g. increased sphincter tones and decreased fluid secretion, which may impair pancreatic ductal clearance and elevate the risk for new pancreatitis attacks and accelerate disease progression. Peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) have been developed to counteract the adverse effects of opioids on the gastrointestinal tract. We hypothesize that the PAMORA naldemedine will reduce the risk of new pancreatitis attacks in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis and hence decelerate disease progression.

methodsThe study is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with allocation of patients to either 0.2 mg naldemedine daily or matching placebo for 12 months. A total of 120 outpatients will be enrolled from five specialist centres in Denmark and Sweden. The main inclusion criteria is a history of recurrent acute pancreatitis (minimum of two confirmed pancreatitis attacks). The primary endpoint is time to acute pancreatitis recurrence after randomization. Secondary outcomes include changes in quality of life, gastrointestinal symptom scores, new-onset diabetes, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, disease severity, health care utilization, adherence to treatment, and frequency of adverse events. Exploratory outcomes are included for mechanistic linkage and include the progression of chronic pancreatitis-related findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and changes in circulating blood markers of inflammation and fibrosis. DISCUSSION: This study investigates if naldemedine can change the natural course of pancreatitis in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis and improve patient outcomes.

trial registrationEudraCT no. 2021-000069-34. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04966559. Registered on July 8, 2021.

Indexed as

Narcotic AntagonistsPancreatitis, ChronicAcute DiseaseAnalgesics, OpioidDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidNarcotic AntagonistsMagnetic resonance imagingNaldemedineOpioidPeripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonistRandomized controlled trialRecurrent acute pancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID37127657
PMCPMC10150502
OpenAlexW4367598175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.