ArticleBMC cancer2023
Liquid-liquid phase separation throws novel insights into treatment strategies for skin cutaneous melanoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- LLPS-based classification and a novel prognostic signature reveal NRF1 as a therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Single-Cell sequencing investigation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes in gastric cancer prognostic models and identification of NOX5 as a novel therapeutic target.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of liquid-liquid phase separation-related genes in osteosarcoma: implications for prognosis, immune infiltration and drug sensitivity.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Multi-omics and machine learning refine HCC molecular subtypes and prognosis based on liquid-liquid phase separation related genes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Identification of prognostic genes associated with phase separation in lung adenocarcinoma and construction of prognostic models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pan-Cancer Analysis of Mutations Affecting Protein Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Revealing Clinical Implications.Biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Liquid-liquid phase separation: an emerging perspective on the tumorigenesis, progression, and treatment of tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Advancing breast cancer biomarkers: a centromere-related gene signature integrated with single-cell analysis for prognostic prediction.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Membraneless organelles in health and disease: exploring the molecular basis, physiological roles and pathological implications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Single-cell sequencing analysis related to sphingolipid metabolism guides immunotherapy and prognosis of skin cutaneous melanoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, there has been growing evidence indicating a relationship between liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and cancer development. However, to date, the clinical significance of LLPS in skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM, hereafter referred to as melanoma) remains to be elucidated. In the current study, the impact of LLPS-related genes on melanoma prognosis has been explored.
methodsLLPS-related genes were retrieved from the DrLLPS database. The prognostic feature for LLPS in melanoma was developed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and verified in the GSE65904 cohort. Based on risk scores, melanoma patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups. Thereafter, the differences in clinicopathological correlation, functional enrichment, immune landscape, tumor mutational burden, and impact of immunotherapy between the two groups were investigated. Finally, the role of key gene TROAP in melanoma was validated by in vitro and in vivo experiments.
resultsThe LLPS-related gene signature was developed based on MLKL, PARVA, PKP1, PSME1, RNF114, and TROAP. The risk score was a crucial independent prognostic factor for melanoma and patients with high-risk scores were related to a worse prognosis. Approximately, all immune-relevant characteristics, such as immune cell infiltration and immune scores, were extremely evident in patients with low-risk scores. The findings from the in vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that the viability, proliferation, and invasion ability of melanoma cells were drastically decreased after the knockdown of TROAP.
conclusionOur gene signature can independently predict the survival of melanoma patients. It provides a basis for the exploration of the relationship between LLPS and melanoma and can offer a fresh perspective on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.