Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127623›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Liquid-liquid phase separation throws novel insights into treatment strategies for skin cutaneous melanoma.

Jianlan Liu, Shengbin Pei, Pengpeng Zhang, Keyu Jiang, Binlin Luo, Zuoqiong Hou, Gang Yao, Jian Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jianlan Liu *Department of Plastic and Burns Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shengbin Pei *Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Pengpeng Zhang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Keyu JiangDepartment of Plastic and Burns Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Binlin LuoDepartment of Plastic and Burns Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zuoqiong HouDepartment of Plastic and Burns Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Gang YaoDepartment of Plastic and Burns Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. yaogang2005@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9040-4284
Jian TangDepartment of Plastic and Burns Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. tangjian@njmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3254-6406
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, there has been growing evidence indicating a relationship between liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and cancer development. However, to date, the clinical significance of LLPS in skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM, hereafter referred to as melanoma) remains to be elucidated. In the current study, the impact of LLPS-related genes on melanoma prognosis has been explored.

methodsLLPS-related genes were retrieved from the DrLLPS database. The prognostic feature for LLPS in melanoma was developed in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and verified in the GSE65904 cohort. Based on risk scores, melanoma patients were categorized into high- and low-risk groups. Thereafter, the differences in clinicopathological correlation, functional enrichment, immune landscape, tumor mutational burden, and impact of immunotherapy between the two groups were investigated. Finally, the role of key gene TROAP in melanoma was validated by in vitro and in vivo experiments.

resultsThe LLPS-related gene signature was developed based on MLKL, PARVA, PKP1, PSME1, RNF114, and TROAP. The risk score was a crucial independent prognostic factor for melanoma and patients with high-risk scores were related to a worse prognosis. Approximately, all immune-relevant characteristics, such as immune cell infiltration and immune scores, were extremely evident in patients with low-risk scores. The findings from the in vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that the viability, proliferation, and invasion ability of melanoma cells were drastically decreased after the knockdown of TROAP.

conclusionOur gene signature can independently predict the survival of melanoma patients. It provides a basis for the exploration of the relationship between LLPS and melanoma and can offer a fresh perspective on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansImmunotherapyPrognosisRisk FactorsImmunotherapyLLPSMelanomaTROAPTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37127623
PMCPMC10150491
OpenAlexW4367624024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.