Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127608›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Baseline status regarding compliance with neo-BFHI recommendations in South African neonatal wards: a cross-sectional survey.

Welma Lubbe, Lisa Springer, Ragnhild Maastrup, Laura N Haiek, Madimetja Nyaloko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Welma LubbeNuMiQ Research Focus Area, North-West University South Africa, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2468-5687
Lisa SpringerNuMiQ Research Focus Area, North-West University South Africa, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4952-7482
Ragnhild MaastrupDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8719-5717
Laura N HaiekMinistère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, Direction générale de la santé publique, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1686-3145
Madimetja NyalokoNuMiQ Research Focus Area, North-West University South Africa, Potchefstroom, South Africa. madimetja.nyaloko@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-1050

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2009, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children's Fund issued a revised Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) package to encourage all healthcare facilities to promote the advice of exclusive breastfeeding. The scope of the BFHI was expanded to include neonatal units by the Nordic and Quebec Working Group.

aimTo determine the level of compliance with the recommendations outlined in the "Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative for neonatal wards" (Neo-BFHI) in the South African neonatal wards.

methodIn this cross-sectional survey, the sample included neonatal wards (N = 33) from public and private hospital facilities. Using EasyTrial software, the Neo-BFHI self-assessment questionnaire was utilized to collect the data. The data was transferred to MS Excel (version 15.0.5127.1000) and analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24.

resultsThe South African median score for Neo-BFHI compliance was 77. Neonatal wards in public hospitals scored higher (85) than those in private hospitals (73). Neonatal wards in hospitals that were accredited Baby-friendly had higher compliance scores than those without accreditation. The country had the highest compliance scores (100, 90) on Guiding Principle 1 (respect towards mothers) and step 5 (breastfeeding support), respectively. However, it scored low (71, 58) on steps 4 (enhancing kangaroo mother care) and 7 (maternal infant "togetherness"), respectively. Level 1 and 2 care facilities scored significantly higher than level 3.

conclusionAlthough South Africa successfully implemented the Neo-BFHI recommendations, private hospitals had a smaller number of BFHI-accredited facilities and lower compliance than public hospitals. Strategies should be developed to strengthen and improve BFHI accreditation and compliance, particularly in private hospitals.

Indexed as

Kangaroo-Mother Care MethodBreast FeedingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHospitals, PrivateHumansInfant, NewbornSouth AfricaBaby-Friendly Hospital InitiativeBreastfeedingComplianceInfantKangaroo mother careNeonatal wards

Identifiers

PMID37127608
PMCPMC10152633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.