Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127606›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2023

Identifying dementia using medical data linkage in a longitudinal cohort study: Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.

Donncha S Mullin, Lucy E Stirland, Emily Buchanan, Catherine-Anne Convery, Simon R Cox, Ian J Deary, Cinzia Giuntoli, Holly Greer, Danielle Page, Elizabeth Robertson and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cognitive dedifferentiation in later life: longitudinal findings from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lessons we learned from the Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936.Genomic psychiatry : advancing science from genes to society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Donncha S MullinAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. D.Mullin@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-8067
Lucy E StirlandAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5678-4583
Emily BuchananAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Catherine-Anne ConveryAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Simon R CoxLothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-3642
Ian J DearyLothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cinzia GiuntoliAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Holly GreerAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Danielle PageLothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Elizabeth RobertsonAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Susan D ShenkinUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7375-4776
Anna SzalekAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Adele TaylorLothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Georgina WeatherdonAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tim WilkinsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8952-0982
Tom C RussAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9797-2188
NHS Lothian · GBAlzheimer Scotland · GBSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Program Development and Pilot CoreP30AG066614 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI KAREN L FINGERMAN · 2020 to 2026
$5.2M
Evaluating Longitudinal Changes in the Human Structural Connectome in Relation to Cognitive AgingR01AG054628 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TUCKER-DROB, ELLIOT MAX · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Large-Scale Genomic Analysis of Aging-Related Cognitive Change Prior to Dementia OnsetRF1AG073593 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TUCKER-DROB, ELLIOT MAX · 2021 to 2021
$2.1M
CLONING OF THE WERNER'S SYNDROME DEFECTR29AG007359 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BURMER, GLENNA C · 1988 to 1992
–
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/R024065/1Medical Research Council MR/X003434/1NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066614NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054628NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG073593NIH HHS 1RF1AG073593; R01AG054628Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 221890/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936) is a longitudinal study of ageing with well-characterised assessments, but until now, it has relied on self-report or proxies for dementia such as cognitive tests. Our aims were twofold: a) to describe a framework for identifying dementia in a cohort study. b) to report the age-specific incidence and prevalence of all-cause dementia and dementia subtypes in 865 individuals in the LBC1936.

methodsElectronic Health Records (EHR) of all participants were reviewed, and relevant information was extracted to form case vignettes for everyone with any record of cognitive dysfunction. The EHR data sources include hospital and clinic letters, general practitioner and hospital referrals, prescribed medications, imaging and laboratory results. Death certificate data were obtained separately. Clinician assessments were performed when there was concern about a participant's cognition. A diagnosis of probable dementia, possible dementia, or no dementia was agreed upon by a consensus diagnostic review board, comprised of a multidisciplinary team of clinical dementia experts who reviewed case vignettes and clinician assessment letters. For those with probable dementia, a subtype was also determined, where possible. We compared the agreement between our newly ascertained dementia diagnoses with the existing self-reported dementia diagnoses.

resultsSelf-reported dementia diagnoses were positive in only 17.8% of ascertained dementia diagnoses. The EHR review identified 163/865 (18.8%) individuals as having cognitive dysfunction. At the consensus diagnostic review board, 118/163 were diagnosed with probable all-cause dementia, a prevalence of 13.6%. Age-specific dementia prevalence increased with age from 0.8% (65-74.9 years) to 9.93% (85-89.9 years). Prevalence rates for women were higher in nearly all age groups. The most common subtype was dementia due to Alzheimer disease (49.2%), followed by mixed Alzheimer and cerebrovascular disease (17.0%), dementia of unknown or unspecified cause (16.1%), and dementia due to vascular disease (8.5%).

conclusionsWe present a robust systematic framework and guide for other cohort teams wanting to ascertain dementia diagnoses. The newly ascertained dementia diagnosis provides vital data for further analyses of LBC1936 to allow exploration of lifecourse predictors of dementia.

Indexed as

Birth CohortCognitive DysfunctionAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalLongitudinal StudiesAgeingAscertainmentDementiaDiagnosisElectronic health recordIdentifyIncidenceLongitudinalOlder adultsOutcomePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID37127606
PMCPMC10152609
OpenAlexW4367600919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.