ArticleBMC genomics2023
High-resolution structural variants catalogue in a large-scale whole genome sequenced bovine family cohort data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Nelore Cattle Structural Variant Catalog.Animal genetics · 2026Article
- Integration of GWAS and eQTL analysis reveals regulatory CNVs for fatty acid traits in cattle.iScience · 2026Article
- Molecular QTL are enriched for structural variants in a cattle long-read cohort.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Detection and evaluation of copy number variation using both linked-read and short-read sequencing in New Zealand dairy cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Genome-wide detection of copy number variations in indigenous Red Sindhi cattle using ddRAD sequencing.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
- Biodiversity Genomics Research Practices Require Harmonising to Meet Stakeholder Needs in Conservation.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- Genome Wide Identification of Structure Variations in Five Italian Turkey Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Pretreatment circulating tumor DNA and tissue genomic profiling concordance in ovarian cancer: a prospective observational study of influencing factors and clinical implications.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Structural Variation Analysis and Breed Comparison of Local Domestic Ducks in Shandong Province, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- A large structural variant collection in Holstein cattle and associated database for variant discovery, characterization, and application.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Calling Structural Variants with Confidence from Short-Read Data in Wild Bird Populations.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Pangenome-genotyped structural variation improves molecular phenotype mapping in cattle.Genome research · 2024Article
- Structural variations in livestock genomes and their associations with phenotypic traits: a review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Structural variants and short tandem repeats impact gene expression and splicing in bovine testis tissue.Genetics · 2023Article
- Advancements in copy number variation screening in herbivorous livestock genomes and their association with phenotypic traits.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStructural variants (SVs) are chromosomal segments that differ between genomes, such as deletions, duplications, insertions, inversions and translocations. The genomics revolution enabled the discovery of sub-microscopic SVs via array and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data, paving the way to unravel the functional impact of SVs. Recent human expression QTL mapping studies demonstrated that SVs play a disproportionally large role in altering gene expression, underlining the importance of including SVs in genetic analyses. Therefore, this study aimed to generate and explore a high-quality bovine SV catalogue exploiting a unique cattle family cohort data (total 266 samples, forming 127 trios).
resultsWe curated 13,731 SVs segregating in the population, consisting of 12,201 deletions, 1,509 duplications, and 21 multi-allelic CNVs (> 50-bp). Of these, we validated a subset of copy number variants (CNVs) utilising a direct genotyping approach in an independent cohort, indicating that at least 62% of the CNVs are true variants, segregating in the population. Among gene-disrupting SVs, we prioritised two likely high impact duplications, encompassing ORM1 and POPDC3 genes, respectively. Liver expression QTL mapping results revealed that these duplications are likely causing altered gene expression, confirming the functional importance of SVs. Although most of the accurately genotyped CNVs are tagged by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) ascertained in WGS data, most CNVs were not captured by individual SNPs obtained from a 50K genotyping array.
conclusionWe generated a high-quality SV catalogue exploiting unique whole genome sequenced bovine family cohort data. Two high impact duplications upregulating the ORM1 and POPDC3 are putative candidates for postpartum feed intake and hoof health traits, thus warranting further investigation. Generally, CNVs were in low LD with SNPs on the 50K array. Hence, it remains crucial to incorporate CNVs via means other than tagging SNPs, such as investigation of tagging haplotypes, direct imputation of CNVs, or direct genotyping as done in the current study. The SV catalogue and the custom genotyping array generated in the current study will serve as valuable resources accelerating utilisation of full spectrum of genetic variants in bovine genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.