Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127589›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2023

Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients with Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia compared to patients with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective study in a 16-year period at the university hospital, Japan.

Satomi Yukawa, Taro Noguchi, Koh Shinohara, Yasuhiro Tsuchido, Masaki Yamamoto, Yasufumi Matsumura, Miki Nagao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical implications of a singleJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Validation of the Proposed Definition for Complicated Coagulase-negative Staphylococcal Bacteremia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A potential XGBoost Diagnostic Score forFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satomi YukawaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Postal Code 6068507, Japan. yukawa@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Taro NoguchiDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Postal Code 6068507, Japan.
Koh ShinoharaDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Postal Code 6068507, Japan.
Yasuhiro TsuchidoDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Postal Code 6068507, Japan.
Masaki YamamotoDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Postal Code 6068507, Japan.
Yasufumi MatsumuraDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Postal Code 6068507, Japan.
Miki NagaoDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Postal Code 6068507, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphyococcus lugudnensis (S. lugdunensis) is one of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species with a potential to cause invasive infections. Few studies have evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of patients with S. lugdunensis bacteremia (SLB) compared with those of patients with Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteremia.

methodsWe performed a single-center retrospective case-control study of patients aged ≥ 18 who had SLB with at least two sets of positive blood cultures at the Kyoto University Hospital, Japan, from January 2005 to June 2022. Patients who had S. epidermidis bacteremia (SEB) with at least two sets of positive blood cultures and those who had S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) with at least one set of positive blood cultures were randomly selected in a 1:5:5 (SLB:SEB:SAB) ratio.

resultsA total of 22 patients with SLB, 110 patients with SEB, and 110 patients with SAB were included. The proportions of infective endocarditis (IE) and metastatic infections were statistically higher in the SLB group than in the SEB group (14% vs. 2%, p < 0.01 and 18% vs. 5%, p 0.02, respectively) and were not significantly different between the SLB and SAB groups (14% vs. 5%, p 0.16 and 18% vs. 16%, p 0.78, respectively). The seven-day mortality was higher in the SLB group than in the SEB group (9% vs. 1%, p 0.02) and similar between the SLB and SAB groups (9% vs. 7%, p 0.77).

conclusionsThe clinical course and outcome of SLB were worse than those of SEB and similar to those of SAB. Appropriate evaluation and treatment for SAB may be warranted in patients with SLB.

Indexed as

BacteremiaStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus lugdunensisAdultCase-Control StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansJapanRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisBacteremiaClinical managementStaphylococciStaphylococcus lugdunenisis

Identifiers

PMID37127589
PMCPMC10150470
OpenAlexW4367625116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.