Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37127353›Full record

ArticleNeurology2023

Revealing Individual Neuroanatomical Heterogeneity in Alzheimer Disease Using Neuroanatomical Normative Modeling.

Serena Verdi, Seyed Mostafa Kia, Keir X X Yong, Duygu Tosun, Jonathan M Schott, Andre F Marquand, James H Cole

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Spatially and temporally progressive hypoperfusion in Alzheimer's disease revealed by normative modeling.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structural similarity networks reveal brain vulnerability in dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Serena VerdiFrom the Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.V., J.H.C.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Dementia Research Centre (S.V., K.X.X.Y., J.M.S., J.H.C.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (S.M.K., A.F.M.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen; Department of Psychiatry (S.M.K.), University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.T.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (A.F.M.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2421-4818
Seyed Mostafa KiaFrom the Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.V., J.H.C.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Dementia Research Centre (S.V., K.X.X.Y., J.M.S., J.H.C.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (S.M.K., A.F.M.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen; Department of Psychiatry (S.M.K.), University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.T.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (A.F.M.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7128-814X
Keir X X YongFrom the Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.V., J.H.C.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Dementia Research Centre (S.V., K.X.X.Y., J.M.S., J.H.C.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (S.M.K., A.F.M.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen; Department of Psychiatry (S.M.K.), University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.T.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (A.F.M.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-3599
Duygu TosunFrom the Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.V., J.H.C.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Dementia Research Centre (S.V., K.X.X.Y., J.M.S., J.H.C.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (S.M.K., A.F.M.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen; Department of Psychiatry (S.M.K.), University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.T.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (A.F.M.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jonathan M SchottFrom the Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.V., J.H.C.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Dementia Research Centre (S.V., K.X.X.Y., J.M.S., J.H.C.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (S.M.K., A.F.M.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen; Department of Psychiatry (S.M.K.), University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.T.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (A.F.M.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Andre F MarquandFrom the Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.V., J.H.C.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Dementia Research Centre (S.V., K.X.X.Y., J.M.S., J.H.C.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (S.M.K., A.F.M.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen; Department of Psychiatry (S.M.K.), University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.T.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (A.F.M.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5903-203X
James H ColeFrom the Centre for Medical Image Computing (S.V., J.H.C.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London; Dementia Research Centre (S.V., K.X.X.Y., J.M.S., J.H.C.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (S.M.K., A.F.M.), Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen; Department of Psychiatry (S.M.K.), University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (D.T.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (A.F.M.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. james.cole@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-5588
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_00019/3NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAlzheimer disease (AD) is highly heterogeneous, with marked individual differences in clinical presentation and neurobiology. To explore this, we used neuroanatomical normative modeling to index regional patterns of variability in cortical thickness. We aimed to characterize individual differences and outliers in cortical thickness in patients with AD, people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and controls. Furthermore, we assessed the relationships between cortical thickness heterogeneity and cognitive function, β-amyloid, phosphorylated-tau, and ApoE genotype. Finally, we examined whether cortical thickness heterogeneity was predictive of conversion from MCI to AD.

methodsCortical thickness measurements across 148 brain regions were obtained from T1-weighted MRI scans from 62 sites of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. AD was determined by clinical and neuropsychological examination with no comorbidities present. Participants with MCI had reported memory complaints, and controls were cognitively normal. A neuroanatomical normative model indexed cortical thickness distributions using a separate healthy reference data set (n = 33,072), which used hierarchical Bayesian regression to predict cortical thickness per region using age and sex, while adjusting for site noise.

resultsPatients with AD (n = 206) had a median of 12 outlier regions (out of a possible 148), with the highest proportion of outliers (47%) in the parahippocampal gyrus. For 62 regions, over 90% of these patients had cortical thicknesses within the normal range. Patients with AD had more outlier regions than people with MCI (n = 662) or controls (n = 159) ( DISCUSSION: Individualized normative maps of cortical thickness highlight the heterogeneous effect of AD on the brain. Regional outlier estimates have the potential to be a marker of disease and could be used to track an individual's disease progression or treatment response in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAmyloid beta-PeptidesBayes TheoremBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAmyloid beta-Peptides

Identifiers

PMID37127353
PMCPMC10264044
OpenAlexW4367597246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.