Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37126552›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

The features underlying the memorability of objects.

Max A Kramer, Martin N Hebart, Chris I Baker, Wilma A Bainbridge

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. ERP effects at encoding: Image memorability or recognition success?Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial and semantic memory reorganize a hippocampal long-axis gradient.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Determinants of visual ambiguity resolution.Communications psychology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Reverse engineering what makes a symbol memorable.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What makes memories vivid?Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  11. Multimodal prior knowledge determines false memory formation.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Max A KramerDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4809-1517
Martin N HebartVision and Computational Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7257-428X
Chris I BakerLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6861-8964
Wilma A BainbridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7554-0736

Funding

Object, face, body and scene representations in the human brainZIAMH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2025
$25.5M
Object, face and body representations in the human brainZ01MH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRISTOPHER · 2008 to 2008
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002909Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What makes certain images more memorable than others? While much of memory research has focused on participant effects, recent studies using a stimulus-centric perspective have sparked debate on the determinants of memory, including the roles of semantic and visual features and whether the most prototypical or atypical items are best remembered. Prior studies have typically relied on constrained stimulus sets, limiting a generalized view of the features underlying what we remember. Here, we collected more than 1 million memory ratings for a naturalistic dataset of 26,107 object images designed to comprehensively sample concrete objects. We establish a model of object features that is predictive of image memorability and examined whether memorability could be accounted for by the typicality of the objects. We find that semantic features exert a stronger influence than perceptual features on what we remember and that the relationship between memorability and typicality is more complex than a simple positive or negative association alone.

Identifiers

PMID37126552
PMCPMC10132746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.