Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37126390›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Acceptance and Privacy Perceptions Toward Video-based Active and Assisted Living Technologies: Scoping Review.

Tamara Mujirishvili, Caterina Maidhof, Francisco Florez-Revuelta, Martina Ziefle, Miguel Richart-Martinez, Julio Cabrero-García

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Event-Based Machine Vision for Edge AI Computing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamara MujirishviliDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6255-2095
Caterina MaidhofCommunication Science, Human-Computer Interaction Center, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0573-4498
Francisco Florez-RevueltaDepartment of Computer Technology, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3391-711X
Martina ZiefleCommunication Science, Human-Computer Interaction Center, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6105-4729
Miguel Richart-MartinezDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-3001
Julio Cabrero-GarcíaDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4452-635X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aging society posits new socioeconomic challenges to which a potential solution is active and assisted living (AAL) technologies. Visual-based sensing systems are technologically among the most advantageous forms of AAL technologies in providing health and social care; however, they come at the risk of violating rights to privacy. With the immersion of video-based technologies, privacy-preserving smart solutions are being developed; however, the user acceptance research about these developments is not yet being systematized.

objectiveWith this scoping review, we aimed to gain an overview of existing studies examining the viewpoints of older adults and/or their caregivers on technology acceptance and privacy perceptions, specifically toward video-based AAL technology.

methodsA total of 22 studies were identified with a primary focus on user acceptance and privacy attitudes during a literature search of major databases. Methodological quality assessment and thematic analysis of the selected studies were executed and principal findings are summarized. The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines were followed at every step of this scoping review.

resultsAcceptance attitudes toward video-based AAL technologies are rather conditional, and are summarized into five main themes seen from the two end-user perspectives: caregiver and care receiver. With privacy being a major barrier to video-based AAL technologies, security and medical safety were identified as the major benefits across the studies.

conclusionsThis review reveals a very low methodological quality of the empirical studies assessing user acceptance of video-based AAL technologies. We propose that more specific and more end user- and real life-targeting research is needed to assess the acceptance of proposed solutions.

Indexed as

PrivacyTechnologyAgedAgingAttitudeHumansassistive technologydisabilityeHealthlife loggingolder adultsprivacytechnologyuser acceptancevideo-based active assisted living technologiesvideo monitoringvirtual assistancevirtual assistantvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37126390
PMCPMC10186188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.