Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37126356›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

IMI 2023 Digest.

Padmaja Sankaridurg, David A Berntsen, Mark A Bullimore, Pauline Cho, Ian Flitcroft, Timothy J Gawne, Kate L Gifford, Monica Jong, Pauline Kang, Lisa A Ostrin and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07779941 (A Pilot Evaluation of Refractive Error Progression in Pre-Myopic Children in Singapore With and Without Myopia Control Spectacles), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07779941 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Evaluation of Refractive Error Progression in Pre-Myopic Children in Singapore With and Without Myopia Control Spectacles

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingapore National Eye CentreRan2026 to 2029Enrolled124ConditionsMyopia, Pre-myopiaArmsZeiss MyoActive lenses, Single Vision Lenses
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysing myopia in Europe: A comprehensive meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Clinical evaluation of MyoCare in Europe (CEME) for myopia management: One-year results.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Changing Natural History of Anisometropia: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Padmaja SankaridurgBrien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
David A BerntsenUniversity of Houston, College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, United States.
Mark A BullimoreUniversity of Houston, College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, United States.
Pauline ChoWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
Ian FlitcroftCentre for Eye Research Ireland, School of Physics and Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Timothy J GawneDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Kate L GiffordQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Monica JongJohnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
Pauline KangSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Lisa A OstrinUniversity of Houston, College of Optometry, Houston, Texas, United States.
Jacinto Santodomingo-RubidoMenicon Company Limited, Nagoya, Japan.
Christine WildsoetUC Berkeley Wertheim School Optometry & Vision Science, Berkeley, California, United States.
James S WolffsohnCollege of Health & Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
University of Houston · USUNSW Sydney · AUAston University · GBJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USMenicon (Japan) · JPQueensland University of Technology · AUSichuan University · CNTechnological University Dublin · IEUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myopia is a dynamic and rapidly moving field, with ongoing research providing a better understanding of the etiology leading to novel myopia control strategies. In 2019, the International Myopia Institute (IMI) assembled and published a series of white papers across relevant topics and updated the evidence with a digest in 2021. Here, we summarize findings across key topics from the previous 2 years. Studies in animal models have continued to explore how wavelength and intensity of light influence eye growth and have examined new pharmacologic agents and scleral cross-linking as potential strategies for slowing myopia. In children, the term premyopia is gaining interest with increased attention to early implementation of myopia control. Most studies use the IMI definitions of ≤-0.5 diopters (D) for myopia and ≤-6.0 D for high myopia, although categorization and definitions for structural consequences of high myopia remain an issue. Clinical trials have demonstrated that newer spectacle lens designs incorporating multiple segments, lenslets, or diffusion optics exhibit good efficacy. Clinical considerations and factors influencing efficacy for soft multifocal contact lenses and orthokeratology are discussed. Topical atropine remains the only widely accessible pharmacologic treatment. Rebound observed with higher concentration of atropine is not evident with lower concentrations or optical interventions. Overall, myopia control treatments show little adverse effect on visual function and appear generally safe, with longer wear times and combination therapies maximizing outcomes. An emerging category of light-based therapies for children requires comprehensive safety data to enable risk versus benefit analysis. Given the success of myopia control strategies, the ethics of including a control arm in clinical trials is heavily debated. IMI recommendations for clinical trial protocols are discussed.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicMyopiaAtropineCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionHumansRefraction, OcularAtropine

Identifiers

PMID37126356
PMCPMC10155872
OpenAlexW4367601515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.