ArticleJAMA network open2023
Patient Experience at US Hospitals Following the Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caregivers as essential members of healthcare teams: lessons learned from enforcement of the "no visitors" policy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Dual Experience and Management of Pain in Older Adults and Their Caregivers.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- Adult-Centred Systems, Youth-Centred Needs: A Qualitative Study of Canadian Caregiving Service Providers' Readiness to Support Young Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Reconsidering risk: instrumental social support and 30-day utilization after discharge.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Unmet supportive care needs in patients with advanced cancer and its impact on distress.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Long-Term Care Services and Supports Needed for Successful Aging-in-Place: A Critical Review.Annual review of public health · 2025Review
- Breadth and Depth of Patient and Caregiver Supportive Services in Community Oncology (WF-1803CD).Psycho-oncology · 2024Article
- Family Involvement in the Care of Hospitalized Older Adults: Protocol for a Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Patient experience with hospital care following the Maryland global budget revenue model: A difference-in-difference analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Centering patients with advanced cancer includes supporting their caregivers.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Learning from patients: The impact of using patients' narratives on patient experience scores.Health care management reviewArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Communication with caregivers is often not established or standardized during hospitalization. The Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act is a state-level policy designed to facilitate communication among patients, caregivers, and clinical care teams during hospitalization to improve patient experience; 42 states have passed this policy since 2014, but whether it was associated with achieving these goals remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether passage of the CARE Act was associated with improvements in patient experience. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a difference-in-differences analysis of short-term, acute-care US hospitals from 2013 to 2019 to analyze changes in patient experience before vs after CARE Act implementation in hospitals located in states that passed the CARE Act compared with those in states that did not. Analyses were performed between September 1, 2021, and July 31, 2022. Exposure: Time-varying indicators for whether a hospital was in a state that passed the CARE Act. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported experience via the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. Results: A total of 2763 hospitals were included, with 2188 hospitals in CARE Act states and 575 in non-CARE Act states. There were differential improvements in patient experience in the measures of communication with nurses (unadjusted mean [SD] score, 78.40% [0.42%]; difference, 0.18 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.07-0.29 percentage points; P = .002), communication with physicians (mean [SD] score, 80.00% [0.19%]; difference, 0.17 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.06-0.28 percentage points; P = .002), and receipt of discharge information (mean [SD] score, 86.40% [0.22%]; difference, 0.11 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.02-0.21 percentage points; P = .02) among CARE Act states compared with non-CARE Act states after policy passage. In subgroup analyses, improvements were larger among hospitals with lower baseline Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems performance on measures of communication with nurses, communication with physicians, and overall hospital rating. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that implementation of the CARE Act was associated with improvements in several measures of patient experience. Policies that formally incorporate caregivers into patient care during hospitalization may improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.