Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37126055›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopathology and clinical science2023

Theories of psychopathology: Introduction to a special section.

Jerillyn S Kent, Kristian Markon, Angus W MacDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopathology and clinical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jerillyn S KentSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas.ORCID 0000-0001-6864-2825
Kristian MarkonDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
Angus W MacDonaldDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota.

Funding

Using a computational and network neuroscience framework to study pharmacological manipulations of state representation processes in early psychosisP50MH119569 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ANGUS W MACDONALD · 2020 to 2026
$24.5M
5/5-Cognitive Neuroscience Task Reliability & Clinical Applications ConsortiumR01MH084861 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MACDONALD, ANGUS W · 2008 to 2024
$3.8M
Persecution in RDoC: Spite Sensitivity and Frontal DysconnectivityR21MH112918 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MACDONALD, ANGUS W · 2017 to 2018
$422k
Investigating the role of cerebellar abnormalities in dysfunctional predictive coding in individuals with schizophreniaF32MH112334 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KENT, JERILLYN · 2017 to 2019
$191k
NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS F32 MH112334NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119569NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084861NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This special section on theories of psychopathology provides an opportunity to collect the emergent, cross-cutting scholarship that is challenging traditional approaches to understanding mental illness. Here, we appraise the state of theory in the field and emphasize the pitfalls of working in the context of overly flexible, unchallenged, and essentially unchallengeable theoretic models, such as the biopsychosocial model, which we argue has become the de facto theoretic model for our field. We further posit that theoretic shortcomings are contributing to the often-referenced pessimism regarding our progress in understanding and treating mental illness, and introduce the charge of the authors of the papers in this section to articulate novel, falsifiable theories of psychopathology. We briefly touch on the intertwined issue of how to define psychopathology and discuss a key issue raised by the array of papers comprising the section, namely how to conceptualize the spatiotemporal boundaries of complex causal systems. We then use this schematic for understanding how these theories relate to each other and to the vanilla biopsychosocial model they are vying to replace. Ultimately, it is our belief and hope that progress in theoretic thinking will catalyze faster progress in research and improvements to and novel developments in clinical prevention and intervention efforts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersHumansModels, BiopsychosocialModels, TheoreticalPersonality InventoryPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID37126055
PMCPMC10353037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.