Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37125766›Full record

SynthesisFoot & ankle international2023

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus Fragment in Ankle Fractures Improves the Patient-Rated Outcome: A Systematic Review.

Rainer Christoph Miksch, Viktoria Herterich, Alexej Barg, Wolfgang Böcker, Hans Polzer, Sebastian Felix Baumbach

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Foot & ankle international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Long-term outcomes after ankle fracture-Where do we stand?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Mid-term outcomes of posterior malleolar fracture plating: identifying predictors of adverse outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  3. The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Aftercare of Ankle Fractures.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. [Fractures of the upper ankle joint].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rainer Christoph MikschMusculoskeletal University Centre Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9388-5335
Viktoria HerterichMusculoskeletal University Centre Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6423-4648
Alexej BargDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang BöckerMusculoskeletal University Centre Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Germany.
Hans PolzerMusculoskeletal University Centre Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6713-4017
Sebastian Felix BaumbachMusculoskeletal University Centre Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6287-6206
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best treatment strategy for fractures to the posterior malleolus (PM) is still intensively debated. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the patient-rated outcome following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for fractures of the PM to either closed reduction using AP screws (CRIF) or no treatment in bi- or trimalleolar ankle fractures.

methodsSystematic literature research (MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, Central and EMBASE) according to the PICOS and PRISMA guidelines. Eligible were studies comparing the outcome following ORIF to any other treatment strategy for fractures to the posterior malleolus in isolated bi- or trimalleolar ankle fractures.

resultsTwelve studies were eligible for a qualitative analysis and 6 for a quantitative analysis. Overall, a considerable heterogeneity among the studies was observed. The most commonly used outcome score was the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS). The final follow-up ranged from 12 to 160 months. Four studies compared ORIF to CRIF of the PM. The quantitative analysis revealed significantly better AOFAS scores for ORIF (90.9 vs 83.4 points;

conclusionDespite a considerable heterogeneity, the data available point to a superior outcome following ORIF for fractures to the PM when compared to CRIF or no treatment.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesAnkle JointFracture Fixation, InternalHumansOpen Fracture ReductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomebimalleolarORIFPROMtrimalleolarVolkmann

Identifiers

PMID37125766
PMCPMC10394961
OpenAlexW4367050698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.