Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37125644›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

RecF protein targeting to post-replication (daughter strand) gaps II: RecF interaction with replisomes.

Camille Henry, Gurleen Kaur, Megan E Cherry, Sarah S Henrikus, Nina J Bonde, Nischal Sharma, Hope A Beyer, Elizabeth A Wood, Sindhu Chitteni-Pattu, Antoine M van Oijen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of the RecFOR Complex in Genome Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular insights into the prototypical single-stranded DNA-binding protein fromCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camille HenryDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706-1544, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4011-6767
Gurleen KaurMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Megan E CherryMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0874-2853
Sarah S HenrikusMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Nina J BondeDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706-1544, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-165X
Nischal SharmaMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-5571
Hope A BeyerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706-1544, USA.
Elizabeth A WoodDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706-1544, USA.
Sindhu Chitteni-PattuDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706-1544, USA.
Antoine M van OijenMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Andrew RobinsonMolecular Horizons Institute and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-0976
Michael M CoxDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706-1544, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3606-5722

Funding

Creation and Repair of Postreplicative DNA GapsRM1GM130450 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Michael M. Cox, MYRON GOODMAN · 2019 to 2026
$10.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM130450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins are an epistasis group involved in loading RecA protein into post-replication gaps. However, the targeting mechanism that brings these proteins to appropriate gaps is unclear. Here, we propose that targeting may involve a direct interaction between RecF and DnaN. In vivo, RecF is commonly found at the replication fork. Over-expression of RecF, but not RecO or a RecF ATPase mutant, is extremely toxic to cells. We provide evidence that the molecular basis of the toxicity lies in replisome destabilization. RecF over-expression leads to loss of genomic replisomes, increased recombination associated with post-replication gaps, increased plasmid loss, and SOS induction. Using three different methods, we document direct interactions of RecF with the DnaN β-clamp and DnaG primase that may underlie the replisome effects. In a single-molecule rolling-circle replication system in vitro, physiological levels of RecF protein trigger post-replication gap formation. We suggest that the RecF interactions, particularly with DnaN, reflect a functional link between post-replication gap creation and gap processing by RecA. RecF's varied interactions may begin to explain how the RecFOR system is targeted to rare lesion-containing post-replication gaps, avoiding the potentially deleterious RecA loading onto thousands of other gaps created during replication.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsBacterial ProteinsDNA RepairDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliBacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsrecF protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID37125644
PMCPMC10287930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.