ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023
Surgical outcomes of gallbladder cancer: the OMEGA retrospective, multicentre, international cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Chinese national clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancers.Chinese medical journal · 2024Guideline
- Safety and cost of selective histopathological analysis for detecting cancer in surgical specimens: a systematic review.ANZ journal of surgeryPooled it
- Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of 31 Cases.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the molecular profile of adenosquamous gallbladder carcinoma: characterization of a Caucasian cohort.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Real-World Application of a Machine Learning-Based Early Recurrence Model for Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Patients with Gallbladder Cancer.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival following resection of gallbladder cancer in older adults: retrospective study.BJS open · 2026Article
- Perioperative approaches for patients with biliary tract cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of Nomogram Predicting Survival in Resectable Gallbladder Cancer.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Article
- Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Hypoalbuminemia as a prognostic marker for survival in biliary tract cancer: associations with tumor type, treatment and sex.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Optimal surgical strategies in patients with T1 and T2 gallbladder cancer: necessity of lymph node dissection and liver resection: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Construction and evaluation of machine learning models for postoperative prognosis prediction of biliary tract malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Performance of major liver resection for gallbladder cancer-a western retrospective single center cohort study.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Exploration of Third-Line and Other Therapeutic Areas After Failure of Chemotherapy Alone.Cancers · 2025Review
- Role of Portal Vein Embolization Alone in Surgical Management of Locally Advanced Gall Bladder Cancer (PROVE-GBC): A Prospective Clinical Trial.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Recent Trends in Surgical Strategies of Early-Stage Gallbladder Cancer: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Letter to the Editor of Annals of Surgical Oncology Concerning "Optimizing Outcomes in Gallbladder Cancer: Identifying Predictors of Futile Up-Front Surgery in a Global Multicenter Study".Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare but aggressive. The extent of surgical intervention for different GBC stages is non-uniform, ranging from cholecystectomy alone to extended resections including major hepatectomy, resection of adjacent organs and routine extrahepatic bile duct resection (EBDR). Robust evidence here is lacking, however, and survival benefit poorly defined. This study assesses factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and morbidity and mortality following GBC surgery in high income countries (HIC) and low and middle income countries (LMIC). Methods: The multicentre, retrospective Operative Management of Gallbladder Cancer (OMEGA) cohort study included all patients who underwent GBC resection across 133 centres between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2020. Regression analyses assessed factors associated with OS, RFS and morbidity. Findings: On multivariable analysis of all 3676 patients, wedge resection and segment IVb/V resection failed to improve RFS (HR 1.04 [0.84-1.29], p = 0.711 and HR 1.18 [0.95-1.46], p = 0.13 respectively) or OS (HR 0.96 [0.79-1.17], p = 0.67 and HR 1.48 [1.16-1.88], p = 0.49 respectively), while major hepatectomy was associated with worse RFS (HR 1.33 [1.02-1.74], p = 0.037) and OS (HR 1.26 [1.03-1.53], p = 0.022). Furthermore, EBDR (OR 2.86 [2.3-3.52], p < 0.0010), resection of additional organs (OR 2.22 [1.62-3.02], p < 0.0010) and major hepatectomy (OR 3.81 [2.55-5.73], p < 0.0010) were all associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Compared to LMIC, patients in HIC were associated with poorer RFS (HR 1.18 [1.02-1.37], p = 0.031) but not OS (HR 1.05 [0.91-1.22], p = 0.48). Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments were infrequently used. Interpretation: In this large, multicentre analysis of GBC surgical outcomes, liver resection was not conclusively associated with improved survival, and extended resections were associated with greater morbidity and mortality without oncological benefit. Aggressive upfront resections do not benefit higher stage GBC, and international collaborations are needed to develop evidence-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies to minimise surgical morbidity and prioritise prognostic benefit. Funding: Cambridge Hepatopancreatobiliary Department Research Fund.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.