Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37125298›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Artificial intelligence for advanced analysis of coronary plaque.

Marly van Assen, Philipp von Knebel Doeberitz, Arshed A Quyyumi, Carlo N De Cecco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computed Tomography and Coronary Plaque Analysis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marly van AssenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Inc. 1365 Clifton Road NE, Suite-AT503, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Philipp von Knebel DoeberitzDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Inc. 1365 Clifton Road NE, Suite-AT503, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Arshed A QuyyumiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 68167, USA.
Carlo N De CeccoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Inc. 1365 Clifton Road NE, Suite-AT503, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of coronary plaque analysis is advancing including more quantitative analysis of coronary artery diseases such as plaque burden, high-risk plaque features, computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve, and radiomics. Although these biomarkers have shown great promise for the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac patients in a research setting, many of these advanced analyses are labour and time intensive and therefore hard to implement in daily clinical practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasing role in supporting the quantification of these new biomarkers. AI offers the opportunity to increase efficiency, reduce human error and reader variability and to increase the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis by automating many processing and supporting clinicians in their decision-making. With the use of AI these novel analysis approaches for coronary artery disease can be made feasible for clinical practice without increasing cost and workload and potentially improve patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCoronary artery calciumCoronary artery diseaseCoronary computed tomography angiographyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37125298
PMCPMC10132604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.