Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37125274›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future.

Marco Schiavone, Roberto Arosio, Simone Valenza, Diego Ruggiero, Gianfranco Mitacchione, Leonida Lombardi, Maurizio Viecca, Giovanni Battista Forleo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco SchiavoneCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Roberto ArosioCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Simone ValenzaCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Diego RuggieroCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Gianfranco MitacchioneCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Leonida LombardiCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Maurizio VieccaCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Giovanni Battista ForleoCardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Luigi Sacco Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as well as the familiarity of cardiac electrophysiologists with the implantation technique, CRT via BVP cannot be achieved or may result ineffective in up to one-third of the patients. Therefore, new alternative techniques, such as conduction system pacing and left ventricular pacing, are emerging as potential alternatives to this technique, not only in case of BVP failure, but also as a stand-alone first choice due to several potential advantages over traditional CRT. Specifically, due to its procedural characteristics, left bundle branch area pacing appears to be the most convincing technique, showing comparable efficacy outcomes when compared with traditional CRT, not increasing short-term device-related complications, as well as improving procedural times. However, transvenous leads remain a major limitation of all these pacing modalities. To overcome this limit, a leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing has been developed as an additional tool to achieve a left endocardial activation, although being still associated with non-negligible pitfalls, limiting its current use in clinical practice. This article focuses on the current state and latest progresses in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Indexed as

Biventricular pacingCardiac resynchronization therapyConduction system pacingHis-bundle pacingLeft bundle branch area pacingLeft ventricular pacing

Identifiers

PMID37125274
PMCPMC10132566
OpenAlexW4367044912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.