ArticleSN computer science2023
What are IBD Patients Talking About on Twitter? Using Natural Language Understanding to Investigate Patients' Tweets.
Article in SN computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Inflammatory Bowel Disease Discourse on Reddit Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic Using OpenAI's GPT-3.5 Turbo Model: Classification Model Validation and Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aims to investigate what patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are talking about on Twitter and learn from the experimental knowledge they share online. The study presents a framework for analyzing patients' tweets and comparing their content to tweets of the general population. We started by constructing two datasets of tweets-a dataset of patients' tweets and a control dataset for comparison. Then, we thematically classified the tweets and obtained a subset of tweets related to health and nutrition. We used a Dirichlet regression to compare the thematic segmentations of the two groups. We continued by extracting keywords from the filtered tweets and applying entity sentiment analysis to determine the patients' sentiments towards the extracted keywords. Finally, we detected emotions within the tweets and used a Wilcoxon test to compare the emotions conveyed in each group. We found statistically significant differences between the patients' thematic segmentations and those of the control group and observed significant differences in the emotions each group expressed while talking about health. Not only do patients talk more about health in comparison to the general Twitter population, but they also address the subject with negative sentiments and express more negative emotions. The personal information IBD patients share on Twitter can be used to derive complementary knowledge about the disease and provide an additional foundation to existing medical research on IBD. The four stages of the study are also feasible to extend to other chronic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.