A mouse ear skin model to study the dynamics of innate immune responses against the microsporidian

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Microsporidia: evolution, infection mechanisms and host impact.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
   Review
2. llluminating the live-cell dynamics of early interactions between neutrophils and the microsporidian parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi.BMC microbiology · 2026
   Article
3. Influence of host cell line and microsporidian species in the in vitro infection efficiency of Encephalitozoon spp.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2026
   Article
4. Microsporidian obligate intracellular parasites subvert autophagy of infected mammalian cells to promote their own growth.mBio · 2025
   Article
5. Chemical disinfection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as