Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37125068›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Adaptation of a bidirectional crisis and emergency risk communication framework by community-engaged research partnerships in rural Mississippi during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Rodney Washington, Jennifer A Weis, Mauda Monger, Nakeitra Burse, Sandra Carr Melvin, Angela A Omondi, Abby M Lohr, Jane W Njeru, Caroline E Compretta, Irene G Sia and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rodney WashingtonSchool of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Jennifer A WeisCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mauda MongerMy Brother's Keeper, Inc, Ridgeland, MS, USA.
Nakeitra BurseSix Dimensions, LLC, Ridgeland, MS, USA.
Sandra Carr MelvinInstitute for the Advancement of Minority Health, Jackson, MS, USA.
Angela A OmondiDepartment of Behavioral and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA.
Abby M LohrCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jane W NjeruDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Caroline E ComprettaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Irene G SiaCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mark L WielandCenter for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6166-3949

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115428 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI HALL, JOHN E · 2016 to 2025
$38.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement is important for reaching populations at risk for health inequities in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A community-engaged risk communication intervention implemented by a community-engaged research partnership in Southeast Minnesota to address COVID-19 prevention, testing, and socioeconomic impacts has demonstrated high acceptability, feasibility, perceived efficacy, and sustainability. In this study, we describe the adaptation of the intervention by a community-academic partnership with rural African American populations in three Mississippi counties with high COVID-19 disparities. Intervention reach was assessed by the number of messages delivered by Communication Leaders to members of their social networks. Perceived scalability of the intervention was assessed by the Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool. Bidirectional communication between Communication Leaders and community members within their social networks was used by the partnership to refine messages, meet resource needs, and advise statewide decision-makers. In the first 3 months, more than 8482 individuals were reached in the three counties. The intervention was deemed to be highly scalable by partnership members. Adaptation of a community-engaged pandemic CERC intervention is feasible and scalable, and it has the potential to reduce COVID-19 inequities across heterogeneous populations. This approach may be incorporated into current and future pandemic preparedness policies for community engagement.

Indexed as

community-engaged researchCOVID-19health disparitiesRisk communicationrural health

Identifiers

PMID37125068
PMCPMC10130849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.