Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124978›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2023

New scoring system for acute chest pain risk stratification: Is it worth SVEAT-ing it?

Mahati Dasari, Pramukh Arun Kumar, Yuvaraj Singh, Eddison Ramsaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahati DasariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA 01608, United States.
Pramukh Arun KumarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA 01608, United States.
Yuvaraj SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA 01608, United States. yuvarajmle@gmail.com.
Eddison RamsaranDepartment of Cardiology, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA 01608, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergency room is a very potent environment in the hospital. With the growing demands of the population, improved accessibility to health resources, and the onslaught of the triple pandemic, it is extremely crucial to triage patients at presentation. In the spectrum of complaints, chest pain is the commonest. Despite it being a daily ailment, chest pain brings concern to every physician at first. Chest pain could span from acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and aortic dissection (all potentially fatal) to reflux, zoster, or musculoskeletal causes that do not need rapid interventions. We often employ scoring systems such as GRACE/PURSUIT/TIMI to assist in clinical decision-making. Over the years, the HEART score became a popular and effective tool for predicting the risk of 30-d major adverse cardiovascular events. Recently, a new scoring system called SVEAT was developed and compared to the HEART score. We have attempted to summarize how these scoring systems differ and their generalizability. With an increasing number of scoring systems being introduced, one must also prevent anchorage bias;

Indexed as

Acute coronary syndromeChest painHEART scoreRisk stratification scoresSVEAT scoreTIMI score

Identifiers

PMID37124978
PMCPMC10130892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.