ReviewCJC open2023
Management of Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes: A HiRO Consensus Handbook on Process of Care.
Review in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Best practice recommendations for the clinical care of spinal bulbar muscular atrophy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Guideline
- Paediatric inherited arrhythmia clinic: developing a new model of care.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Unmasking Brugada syndrome: a case report of diagnostic oversights.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Fetal Long QT Syndrome: Case Series and Literature Review With Focus on Multidisciplinary Care Coordination.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
- China Multi-Center Cohort Study on Risk Evaluation of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: The ChinaCORE ACM Registry.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Serial Exercise Testing in Children With Known or Suspected Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: A Narrative Review and Survey of Current Practice.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Demographics, Clinical Features and Genetics of Common Inherited Arrhythmias in Oman.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2025Article
- Cardiac channelopathies in pediatrics: a genetic update.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inherited arrhythmia syndromes are rare genetic conditions that predispose seemingly healthy individuals to sudden cardiac arrest and death. The Hearts in Rhythm Organization is a multidisciplinary Canadian network of clinicians, researchers, patients, and families that aims to improve care for patients and families with inherited cardiac conditions, focused on those that confer predisposition to arrhythmia and sudden cardiac arrest and/or death. The field is rapidly evolving as research discoveries increase. A streamlined, practical guide for providers to diagnose and follow pediatric and adult patients with inherited cardiac conditions represents a useful tool to improve health system utilization, clinical management, and research related to these conditions. This review provides consensus care pathways for 7 conditions, including the 4 most common inherited cardiac conditions that confer predisposition to arrhythmia, with scenarios to guide investigation, diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. These conditions include Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and related arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. In addition, an approach to investigating and managing sudden cardiac arrest, sudden unexpected death, and first-degree family members of affected individuals is provided. Referral to specialized cardiogenetic clinics should be considered in most cases. The intention of this review is to offer a framework for the process of care that is useful for both experts and nonexperts, and related allied disciplines such as hospital management, diagnostic services, coroners, and pathologists, in order to provide high-quality, multidisciplinary, standardized care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.