Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124920›Full record

ArticleBiophysical reviews2023

Damien Hall

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biophysical Reviews: peering into 2024.Biophysical reviews · 2024
    Article
  3. Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Article
  4. Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Damien HallWPI Nano Life Science Institute, Kanazawa University, Kakumamachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1164 Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Editorial (Vol. 15 Issue 2-Regular Issue) first announces the winner of the 2023 Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists' Independent Research before then going on to describe the contents of the current Issue. The Editorial closes with a discussion of the pros and cons of writing in the formulation of scientific ideas.

Identifiers

PMID37124920
PMCPMC10133413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.