SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Comparative efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in increasing final height of idiopathic short stature boys: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [First experience using an aromatase inhibitor in combination with growth hormone to improve growth prognosis in a 14-year-old boy with growth hormone deficiency after treatment of craniopharyngioma. A case-report].Problemy endokrinologii · 2024Article
- [Pharmacological therapies for height improvement in pubertal children with short stature].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of monotherapy with AIs or GnRHa in improving the height of boys with idiopathic short stature (ISS). Method: We performed a systematic search in Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, and Wanfang Database for eligible studies. The network meta-analysis was conducted using STATA software. Results: We identified a total of four studies that included 136 individuals. We used FAH/PAH as the main outcome of final height. The results revealed a statistically higher final height after treatment with AI or GnRHa in idiopathic short stature children(MD= 4.63, 95% CI[3.29,5.96]). In network meta-analysis, the direct and indirect comparison between AI and GnRHa was presented in the forest plot. Compared with control group, both AI and GnRHa were effective in increasing the final height, with the mean effect of 4.91(95%CI:1.10,8.17) and 5.55(95%CI:1.12,9.98) respectively. However, there was no statistical difference between the GnRHa and AI treatment, of which the mean effect was 0.65(95%CI: -4.30,5.60). Conclusion: Both AIs and GnRHa monotherapy were effective in augmenting the final height of boys with idiopathic short stature when compared to placebo groups. However, there was no statistical difference between the GnRHa and AI treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.