ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2023
Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) liver tumors: an international multicenter propensity-score matched cohort study of 799 cases.
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.BJS open · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic liver resection in minimally invasive expert centers is associated with a very low rate of bile leakage: results from a national multicenter cohort.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic liver surgery: a German real-world analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Robotic-Assisted ALPPS: Expanding the Frontiers of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Robotic versus open hepatectomy for large(≥ 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: A large volume center, propensity score matched study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Experience-based transition to robotic surgery in an experienced program in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Robotic management of huge hepatic angiomyolipoma: A case report and literature review.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2024Article
- Insights into the 2023 multidisciplinary surgical treatment guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: perspectives from Italian Professional Associations.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- Emergency robotic surgery: the experience of a single center and review of the literature.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Review
- ASO Author Reflections: Technical Approach to Inferior Vena Cava Resection and Replacement During Liver Resection: The Role of Conventional Open Technique in the Modern Era of Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Robotic versus Laparoscopic Liver Resections for Colorectal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2024Review
- RoboticHeliyon · 2024Article
- Comparative study of operative expenses: robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open liver resections at a university hospital in the UK.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The use of laparoscopic (LLR) and robotic liver resections (RLR) has been safely performed in many institutions for liver tumours. A large scale international multicenter study would provide stronger evidence and insight into application of these techniques for huge liver tumours ≥10 cm. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 971 patients who underwent LLR and RLR for huge (≥10 cm) tumors at 42 international centers between 2002-2020. Results: One hundred RLR and 699 LLR which met study criteria were included. The comparison between the 2 approaches for patients with huge tumors were performed using 1:3 propensity-score matching (PSM) (73 Conclusions: RLR and LLR can be performed safely for selected patients with huge liver tumours with excellent outcomes. There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes after RLR or LLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.