ArticleAnaesthesia reports
Surgical tracheostomy in a patient with a stuck tracheal tube in situ.
Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inability to extubate a patient's trachea due to a mechanical complication is rarely encountered in clinical practice. The risks of attempting to remove a stuck tracheal tube include laryngeal trauma, vocal cord injury and arytenoid dislocation, all of which have significant implications. Here, we report the case of a patient who was admitted to the intensive care unit for mechanical ventilation following liver transplant surgery. Her trachea was initially extubated on the second postoperative day, but she required further mechanical ventilation the following day and her trachea was re-intubated. Five days later, she was deemed suitable for tracheal extubation, but the formation of granulation tissue around the tracheal tube prevented its removal. A multi-disciplinary decision-making approach was taken when deciding to site a surgical tracheostomy. A flexible bronchoscope was used as an aid for safe placement. This facilitated safe extrication of the tracheal tube, which was freed by gentle manipulation both proximally and distally. We suspect that tracheal tube size may have been a factor in the development of the granulation tissue in this case. It is important to consider tracheal tube size in all patients, particularly if they require tracheal re-intubation or are likely to require mechanical ventilation for a prolonged period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.