Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124618›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2023

10 Years of GWAS in intraocular pressure.

Xiaoyi Raymond Gao, Marion Chiariglione, Hélène Choquet, Alexander J Arch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoyi Raymond GaoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Marion ChiariglioneDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Hélène ChoquetDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
Alexander J ArchDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
The Ohio State University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

The Role of Refractive Error in the Etiology of GlaucomaR01EY027004 · NEI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHOQUET, HELENE · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable risk factor for glaucoma, the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. In this review, we summarize the findings of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of IOP published in the past 10 years and prior to December 2022. Over 190 genetic loci and candidate genes associated with IOP have been uncovered through GWASs, although most of these studies were conducted in subjects of European and Asian ancestries. We also discuss how these common variants have been used to derive polygenic risk scores for predicting IOP and glaucoma, and to infer causal relationship with other traits and conditions through Mendelian randomization. Additionally, we summarize the findings from a recent large-scale exome-wide association study (ExWAS) that identified rare variants associated with IOP in 40 novel genes, six of which are drug targets for clinical treatment or are being evaluated in clinical trials. Finally, we discuss the need for future genetic studies of IOP to include individuals from understudied populations, including Latinos and Africans, in order to fully characterize the genetic architecture of IOP.

Indexed as

ExWASGWASintraocular pressureMendelian randomizationpolygenic risk scoreunderrepresented population

Identifiers

PMID37124618
PMCPMC10130654
OpenAlexW4365148385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.