Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Yuhang Zhou, Yuchen Zhou, Chuandong Wang, Rong Ye, Xiaojun Lin, Song Tan, Weijie Chen, Yulong Mi, Changshun Yang, Shengtao Lin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuhang ZhouShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yuchen ZhouThe First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Chuandong WangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Rong YeThe First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaojun LinShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Song TanShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Weijie ChenShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yulong MiShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Changshun YangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Shengtao LinShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Weihua LiShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) is a difficult but popular anastomotic approach for reconstruction of digestive tract after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, which may reduce some limitations faced during extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). Methods: A retrospective review of 78 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy by a veteran surgeon in a high-volume public tertiary hospital, including 50 patients with IA and 28 patients with EA. The intraoperative-related factors and short-term results of the two anastomotic approaches were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in demographics and clinical characteristics between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss was less (P=0.010) and the incision length was shorter (P<0.001) in the intracorporeal group. Postoperative farting time was faster (P=0.005) and postoperative pain score (VAS) was lower (P<0.001) in IA group. Although the anastomotic time of IA was shorter (P<0.001), the operative time of the two groups were similar. And number of lymph nodes harvested, NLR from POD Conclusion: IA is a reliable and feasible procedure, which has faster anastomotic time, earlier return of bowel function and superior postoperative comfort of patient, compared to EA. The postoperative complication rate of IA is similar to that of EA, and may be improved with the IA technical maturity of surgeons, which potentially contributes to the development of ERAS.

Indexed as

anastomotic approachextracorporeal anastomosisfunctional end-to-end anastomosisintracorporeal anastomosislaparoscopic right hemicolectomystapled techniques

Identifiers

PMID37124506
PMCPMC10130395
OpenAlexW4365148750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.