ArticleAdvances in bridge engineering2023
Effect of structural repairs on the load rating and reliability of a prestressed concrete bridge.
Article in Advances in bridge engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Condition transfer between prestressed bridges using structural state translation for structural health monitoring.AI in civil engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prestressed girders often deteriorate over time due to environmental and man-made stressors, lowering the strength and serviceability of bridge structures. Although structural repairs are implemented to improve the load carrying capacity of the structure, the presence of numerous unknowns leads to high uncertainty in estimating the adequacy of repairs. For instance, the cross-section of the remaining strands, material properties, applied external loads, and workmanship assumptions made throughout the repair process introduce ambiguities when estimating the adequacy of the repairs. This study evaluates the efficiency of re-tensioning repairs of prestressed concrete bridge span girders. The repairs include field splicing, re-tensioning, of deteriorated or damaged strands by torquing a splicing coupler. The evaluation in this study considers component, system reliability, and load ratings while accounting for several uncertainties, such as structural repair, material properties, and external loads. This paper introduces an approach to account for prestressing strands damage and repair uncertainties while also accounting for other uncertainties. In this regard, five cases are studied: as-built, repaired, and three varying degrees of damage cases. First, the distribution for structural demand and capacity accounting for uncertainty in loads, material properties, and repair process is defined for each girder in the prestressed concrete bridge span. In doing so, Monte-Carlo simulation is employed to determine the distributions. Accordingly, the limit state function of the girders is defined from the obtained distributions. Then, the component reliability of each AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) Type II girder is calculated from the obtained reliability indices based on the determined limit state functions. Finally, a system reliability model of the span is developed from the component reliability of each girder. Some advantages and disadvantages of using component and system reliability index versus load rating in damaged and repaired prestressed concrete bridge girders are also discussed. Several critical conclusions are made regarding the uncertainties in structural repair, material properties and external loads, and their impact on the load rating and the component and system reliability of the prestressed concrete bridge structure girders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.