ArticleHippokratia
Giant malignant phyllodes tumor with distant metastases: a case report and review of the literature.
Article in Hippokratia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhyllodes tumors (PTs) represent a rare type of breast tumor and are classified into benign, borderline, and malignant. Giant PTs, meaning those sized more than ten cm, are even rarer, most commonly malignant, and usually have a dismal prognosis due to the high metastatic potential. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 55-year-old woman who underwent modified radical mastectomy and left axillary lymphadenectomy for a rapidly growing, giant, ulcerated mass of the left breast. Histopathologic examination revealed a malignant phyllodes tumor (MPT). Over one year after the initial surgery, the patient was found to have extensive thoracic and retroperitoneal metastases.
conclusionAlthough giant PTs are uncommon, clinical suspicion should be high in rapidly growing breast mass patients. A comprehensive review of all metastatic giant MPT cases reported in the English literature emphasizes the lack of consensus regarding appropriate treatment. In the case of metastatic foci, pathologists need to be aware of the previous history to make a definitive diagnosis. Also, a comparative histopathologic study of the primary and metastatic tumors is sometimes necessary. HIPPOKRATIA 2022, 26 (1):41-45.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37124283PMC10132391W4367601468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.