Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124265›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Self-stigma and cognitive insight in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Bouwina Esther Sportel, Mirjam van Enthoven, Rozanne J M van Donkersgoed, Daan Jan Kuis, Tara van de Giessen, Paul H Lysaker, Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon, Steven de Jong, Nynke Boonstra, Gerdina H M Pijnenborg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Bouwina Esther SportelDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Assen, Netherlands.
Mirjam van EnthovenDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Assen, Netherlands.
Rozanne J M van DonkersgoedDepartment of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Daan Jan KuisDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Assen, Netherlands.
Tara van de GiessenDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Assen, Netherlands.
Paul H LysakerDepartment of Psychiatry, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Ilanit Hasson-OhayonDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Steven de JongLentis Psychiatric Institute, Groningen, Netherlands.
Nynke BoonstraKieN Early Intervention Service, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
Gerdina H M PijnenborgDepartment of Psychotic Disorders, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Assen, Netherlands.
GGZ Drenthe · NLBar-Ilan University · ILIndiana University School of MedicineLentis · NLNHL Stenden University of Applied SciencesUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Impaired cognitive insight and increased self-stigma have been consistently reported in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, but little is known about its presence in individuals at ultra-high risk of developing a psychosis, although self-stigma is associated with transition.to psychosis. The current study examined whether self-stigma is already present in individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis, and whether this is associated with impaired cognitive insight. Methods: 184 participants were recruited divided over three groups, namely individuals diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD; n = 92, 34% females), individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR; n = 43, 59% females) and general population controls (GPC; n = 49, 27% females). All participants completed assessments on demographic information (gender, age, education), and cognitive insight. In addition, participants with SSD and individuals at UHR completed a questionnaire on self-stigma. Results: The level of self-stigma did not differ between individuals at UHR and individuals diagnosed with SSD. Cognitive insight also did not differ significantly between the three groups, but the subscale self-reflection differed between the three groups [ Conclusion: Findings show that self-stigma was already present in the UHR phase, to a similar degree as in individuals with a diagnosis of a SSD, and is thus not dependent of previous experience of having a label of SSD. Cognitive insight in individuals at UHR of psychosis appears to be intact, but individuals at UHR showed more self-reflectiveness, and individuals at risk with high cognitive insight also experience high levels of self-stigma. Overall findings from our study suggest that pre-emptive interventions targeting self-stigma, while considering cognitive insight, are needed early on in manifestation of psychotic illness, preferably already in the UHR phase.

Indexed as

cognitive insightinsightpsychosisschizophreniaself-stigmastigmaultra-high risk

Identifiers

PMID37124265
PMCPMC10133542
OpenAlexW4365455449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.