Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124129›Full record

ReviewBioinformatics and biology insights2023

Bioinformatic Evaluation of Features on Cis-regulatory Elements at 6q25.1.

N Sreekar, Smeeta Shrestha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N SreekarDepartment of Genetics, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, India.
Smeeta ShresthaDepartment of Genetics, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, India.
Dayananda Sagar University

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic non-coding regulatory features contribute significantly to cellular plasticity which on aberration leads to cellular malignancy. Enhancers are cis-regulatory elements that contribute to the development of resistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer leading to poor clinical outcome. ER is vital for therapeutic targets in ER-positive breast cancer. Here, we review and report the different regulatory features present on ER with the objective to delineate potential mechanisms which may contribute to development of resistance. The UCSC Genome Browser, data mining, and bioinformatics tools were used to review enhancers, transcription factors (TFs), histone marks, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and variants residing in the non-coding region of the ER gene. We report 7 enhancers, 3 of which were rich in TF-binding sites and histone marks in a cell line-specific manner. Furthermore, some enhancers contain estrogen resistance variants and sites for lncRNA. Our review speculates putative models suggesting potential aberrations in gene regulation and expression if these regulatory landscapes and assemblies are altered. This review gives an interesting perspective in designing integrated in vitro studies including non-coding elements to study development of endocrine resistance in ER-positive breast cancer.

Indexed as

chromatin stateenhancerEstrogen receptorestrogen resistancegene regulationnon-coding DNARNAtranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID37124129
PMCPMC10134125
OpenAlexW4367021130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.