Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124122›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2023

The Role of Surveillance Inspections in Reducing False-Positives of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants during the COVID-19 Epidemic.

Li-Li Liu, Yu-Hong Zheng, You-Quan Zhang, Jin-Piao Lin, Zhi-Lin Luo, Liu-Min Yu, Shi-Hua Gao, Falin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Li LiuDepartment of Center of Clinical Laboratory, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4968-4266
Yu-Hong ZhengDepartment of Laboratory, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0095-5195
You-Quan ZhangDepartment of Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Quanzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1487-1707
Jin-Piao LinDepartment of Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-1417
Zhi-Lin LuoDepartment of Laboratory, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4634-977X
Liu-Min YuDepartment of Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7612-733X
Shi-Hua GaoThe Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University of First Hospital of Nanping, Nanping, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0351-0829
Falin ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1957-8374
Fujian Medical University · CNPutian University · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CNFujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNXiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of surveillance inspections conducted by the provincial health committee in Quanzhou city during a COVID-19 outbreak in reducing false-positive results in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays. Method: The team conducted on-site inspections of laboratories that participated in mass screening, recording any violations of rules. Results: The positive cases in five rounds of mass screening were 23, 173, and 4 in Licheng District, Fengze District, and Luojang District, respectively. The false-positive rates in the five rounds of mass screening were 0.0099%, 0.0063%, 0.0018%, 0.0006%, and 0%, respectively. The study also recorded that the number of violations in the seven selected laboratories was 36, 68, 69, 42, 60, 54 and 47. The corresponding false-positive rates were 0.0012%, 0.0060%, 0.0082%, 0.0032%, 0.0060%, 0.0027%, and 0.0021%, respectively. The study found a positive correlation between false-positive rates and the number of violations ( Conclusion: Daily surveillance inspection in laboratories can remind laboratories to strictly comply with standard procedures, focus on laboratory quality control, and reduce the occurrence of false-positive cases in SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests to some extent. This study recommends that government decision-making departments establish policies and arrange experts to conduct daily surveillance inspections to improve laboratory quality control.

Identifiers

PMID37124122
PMCPMC10132893
OpenAlexW4366687470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.