ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2023
GAN-based patient information hiding for an ECG authentication system.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generative Adversarial Networks for Modeling Bio-Electric Fields in Medicine: A Review of EEG, ECG, EMG, and EOG Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From large language models to multimodal AI: a scoping review on the potential of generative AI in medicine.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Enhancing biometric identification using 12-lead ECG signals and graph convolutional networks.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Principal component conditional generative adversarial networks for imbalanced ECG classification enhancement.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review on spiking neural network-based ECG classification methods for low-power environments.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various biometrics such as the face, irises, and fingerprints, which can be obtained in a relatively simple way in modern society, are used in personal authentication systems to identify individuals. These biometric data are extracted from an individual's physiological data and yield high performance in identifying an individual using unique data patterns. Biometric identification is also used in portable devices such as mobile devices because it is more secure than cryptographic token-based authentication methods. However, physiological data could include personal health information such as arrhythmia related patterns in electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. To protect sensitive health information from hackers, the biomarkers of certain diseases or disorders that exist in ECG signals need to be hidden. Additionally, to implement the inference models for both arrhythmia detection and personal authentication in a mobile device, a lightweight model such as a multi-task deep learning model should be considered. This study demonstrates a multi-task neural network model that simultaneously identifies an individual's ECG and arrhythmia patterns using a small network. Finally, the computational efficiency and model size of the single-task and multi-task models were compared based on the number of parameters. Although the multi-task model has 20,000 fewer parameters than the single-task model, they yielded similar performance, which demonstrates the efficient structure of the multi-task model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.