ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
A Deep Learning Framework to Estimate Elastic Modulus from Ultrasound Measured Displacement Fields.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 2D Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Deep Neural Networks.IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2026Article
- Ultrasound elastic modulus reconstruction using a deep learning model trained with simulated data.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) elastography is a technique that enables non-invasive quantification of material properties, such as stiffness, from ultrasound images of deforming tissue. The displacement field is measured from the US images using image matching algorithms, and then a parameter, often the elastic modulus, is inferred or subsequently measured to identify potential tissue pathologies, such as cancerous tissues. Several traditional inverse problem approaches, loosely grouped as either direct or iterative, have been explored to estimate the elastic modulus. Nevertheless, the iterative techniques are typically slow and computationally intensive, while the direct techniques, although more computationally efficient, are very sensitive to measurement noise and require the full displacement field data (i.e., both vector components). In this work, we propose a deep learning approach to solve the inverse problem and recover the spatial distribution of the elastic modulus from one component of the US measured displacement field. The neural network used here is trained using only simulated data obtained via a forward finite element (FE) model with known variations in the modulus field, thus avoiding the reliance on large measurement data sets that may be challenging to acquire. A U-net based neural network is then used to predict the modulus distribution (i.e., solve the inverse problem) using the simulated forward data as input. We quantitatively evaluated our trained model with a simulated test dataset and observed a 0.0018 mean squared error (MSE) and a 1.14% mean absolute percent error (MAPE) between the reconstructed and ground truth elastic modulus. Moreover, we also qualitatively compared the output of our U-net model to experimentally measured displacement data acquired using a US elastography tissue-mimicking calibration phantom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.