Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124050›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023

A Deep Learning Framework to Estimate Elastic Modulus from Ultrasound Measured Displacement Fields.

Utsav Ratna Tuladhar, Richard A Simon, Cristian A Linte, Michael S Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Utsav Ratna TuladharElectrical and Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Richard A SimonBiomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Cristian A LinteBiomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Michael S RichardsBiomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

Biomedical Computing and Visualization Tools for Computer-integrated Diagnostic and Therapeutic Data ScienceR35GM128877 · NIGMS · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Cristian A Linte · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) elastography is a technique that enables non-invasive quantification of material properties, such as stiffness, from ultrasound images of deforming tissue. The displacement field is measured from the US images using image matching algorithms, and then a parameter, often the elastic modulus, is inferred or subsequently measured to identify potential tissue pathologies, such as cancerous tissues. Several traditional inverse problem approaches, loosely grouped as either direct or iterative, have been explored to estimate the elastic modulus. Nevertheless, the iterative techniques are typically slow and computationally intensive, while the direct techniques, although more computationally efficient, are very sensitive to measurement noise and require the full displacement field data (i.e., both vector components). In this work, we propose a deep learning approach to solve the inverse problem and recover the spatial distribution of the elastic modulus from one component of the US measured displacement field. The neural network used here is trained using only simulated data obtained via a forward finite element (FE) model with known variations in the modulus field, thus avoiding the reliance on large measurement data sets that may be challenging to acquire. A U-net based neural network is then used to predict the modulus distribution (i.e., solve the inverse problem) using the simulated forward data as input. We quantitatively evaluated our trained model with a simulated test dataset and observed a 0.0018 mean squared error (MSE) and a 1.14% mean absolute percent error (MAPE) between the reconstructed and ground truth elastic modulus. Moreover, we also qualitatively compared the output of our U-net model to experimentally measured displacement data acquired using a US elastography tissue-mimicking calibration phantom.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElasticity ImagingElastographyInverse ProblemUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37124050
PMCPMC10134848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.