Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37124028›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Is Oligometastatic Cancer Curable? A Survey of Oncologist Perspectives, Decision Making, and Communication.

Hae Lin Cho, Tracy Balboni, Sebastian Matthias Christ, Brandon Turner, Alexander Spektor, Subha Perni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Radiation and Medical Oncology Perspectives on Oligometastatic Disease Treatment.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hae Lin ChoHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tracy BalboniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sebastian Matthias ChristDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brandon TurnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alexander SpektorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Subha PerniDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) refers to a limited state of metastatic cancer, which potentially derives benefit from local treatments. Given the relative novelty of this paradigm, oncologist perspectives on OMD are not well established. We thus explored oncologist views on curability of and treatment recommendations for patients with OMD. Methods and Materials: We developed a survey focused on oncologist views of 3 subtypes of OMD: synchronous, oligorecurrent, and oligoprogressive. Eligible participants included medical and radiation oncologists at 2 large cancer centers invited to participate between May and June 2022. Participants were presented with 3 hypothetical patient scenarios and asked about treatment recommendations, rationale, and demographic information. Results: Of 44 respondents, over half (61.4%) agreed that synchronous OMD is curable. A smaller proportion (46.2% and 13.5%) agreed for oligorecurrence and oligoprogression, respectively. When asked whether they use the word "cure" or "curative" in discussing prognosis, 31.8% and 33.3% agreed for synchronous and oligorecurrent OMD, respectively, while 78.4% disagreed for oligoprogression. Views on curability did not significantly affect treatment recommendations. More medical oncologists recommended systemic treatment only compared with radiation oncologists for the synchronous OMD (50.0% vs 5.3%; Conclusions: In this exploratory study, we found notable divergence in oncologists' views about curability of OMD as well as variability in treatment recommendations, suggesting need for more robust research on outcomes of patients with OMD.

Identifiers

PMID37124028
PMCPMC10130609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.