ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Outcomes After Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Return to Sport at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up in Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy With Capsular Plication.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Combined Periacetabular Osteotomy and Hip Arthroscopy Results in High Return to Sport Rates in Contact and Noncontact Athletes With Hip Dysplasia.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Revision hip arthroscopy: Current concepts and considerations in diagnosis, evaluation, and management.Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2026Review
- Comparing 2-Year Outcomes between Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome vs. Hip Arthroscopy Alone for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Without Dysplasia.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Combined Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Reconstruction With Dermal Allograft Hip Capsular Reconstruction.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Indications for Acetabular and Femoral Osteotomies for the Non-Arthritic Hip.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- A retrospective cohort study: dual cannula combined with modified shoelace continuous capsular closure technique versus nonrepair in hip arthroscopic surgery of femoroacetabular impingement.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Femurs in patients with hip dysplasia have fundamental shape differences compared with cam femoroacetabular impingement.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Article
- Periacetabular osteotomy with and without concomitant arthroscopy: a systematic review of evidence on post-operative activity levels and return to sport.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy in acetabular dysplastic patients, previously treated with periacetabular osteotomy: a minimum of two-year follow-up data from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Despite several studies' reports on outcomes of concomitant hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), there is a paucity of aggregate data in the literature. Purpose: To evaluate outcomes and survivorship after concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched in April 2022 using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The following keywords were used: (hip OR femoroacetabular impingement) AND (arthroscopy OR arthroscopic) AND (periacetabular osteotomy or rotational osteotomy) AND (outcomes OR follow-up). Of 270 articles initially identified, 10 studies were ultimately included. The following information was recorded for each study if available: publication information; study design; study period; patient characteristics; follow-up time; indications for hip arthroscopy; patient-reported outcomes (PROs); rates of secondary hip preservation surgeries; and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Survivorship was defined as nonconversion to THA. Results: The study periods for the 10 included articles ranged from 2001 to 2018. Three studies were level 3 evidence, and 7 studies were level 4 evidence. This review included 553 hips with a mean follow-up of 1 to 12.8 years. All 10 studies listed dysplasia as an indication for surgery. Of 9 studies that reported PRO scores, 7 reported significant improvement after surgery. Studies with a <5-year follow-up reported conversion to THA rates of 0% to 3.4% and overall secondary surgery rates of 0% to 10.3%. Similarly, studies with >5-year follow-up reported conversion to THA rates of 0% to 3% and overall secondary surgery rates of 0% to 10%. Conclusion: Patients who underwent concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO reported favorable outcomes, with 7 of the 9 studies that provided PRO scores indicating significant preoperative to postoperative improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.