ArticleHeliyon2023
Empirical assessment of species vulnerability for biodiversity conservation: A case study on Chalan beel of Bangladesh.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study was conducted to assess the current biodiversity in Chalan beel, Natore district, Bangladesh. Primary data were collected through stratified random sampling and analyzed through a combination of descriptive statistical and mathematical techniques. The Shannon-Weiner and Margalef richness indices were used to quantify the biodiversity of birds, and fauna. The Shannon-Weiner diversity index was 2.097, 0.944, and 1.510 for the fish, bird, and other faunal communities, respectively. The Species Ability to Forestall Extinction (S.A.F.E.) index was used to enumerate threatened status among native birds and other faunal species in Chalan beel areas and the IUCN conservation status was assessed simultaneously. The most threatened community was birds, which comprised 28.12% of critically endangered species. According to the weighted perception index, 90.0% of respondents agreed with positive statements, and 89.0% agreed with negative statements, regarding the effects of natural disasters on biodiversity and the significance of the factors was justified through the multinomial logit model. The reasons for the depletion of fish and waterfowl were identified according to farmers' responses, and failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) was used to rank the causes of depletion according to intensity. This study identified the overall biodiversity status of Chalan beel as a representative wetland to assist policymakers in conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.