Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37123927›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Building composite indices in the age of big data - Application to honey bee exposure to infectious and parasitic agents.

M Huyen Ton Nu Nguyet, S Bougeard, A Babin, E Dubois, C Druesne, M P Rivière, M Laurent, M P Chauzat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M Huyen Ton Nu NguyetParis-Est University, ANSES, Laboratory for Animal Health, Maisons-Alfort, France.
S BougeardANSES, Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory, Epidemiology and Welfare of Pork, France.
A BabinANSES, Sophia Antipolis Laboratory, Unit of Honey Bee Pathology, France.
E DuboisANSES, Sophia Antipolis Laboratory, Unit of Honey Bee Pathology, France.
C DruesneANSES, Research Funding & Scientific Watch Department, Maisons-Alfort, France.
M P RivièreANSES, Sophia Antipolis Laboratory, Unit of Honey Bee Pathology, France.
M LaurentANSES, Sophia Antipolis Laboratory, Unit of Honey Bee Pathology, France.
M P ChauzatParis-Est University, ANSES, Laboratory for Animal Health, Maisons-Alfort, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollinator insects play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity and agricultural production worldwide. Yet they are subject to various infectious and parasitic agents (IPAs). To better assess their exposure to IPAs, discriminative and quantitative molecular methods have been developed. These tools produce large datasets that need to be summarised so as to be interpreted. In this paper, we described the calculation of three types of composite indices (numerical, ordinal, nominal) to characterize the honey bee exposure to IPAs in 128 European sites. Our summarizing methods are based on component-based factorial analyses. The indices summarised the dataset of eight IPAs quantified at two sampling times, into synthetic values providing different yet complementary information. Because our dataset included two sampling times, we used Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) to synthetize the information. More precisely, the numerical and ordinal indices were generated from the first component of MFA, whereas the nominal index used the first main components of MFA combined with a clustering analysis (Hierarchical Clustering on components). The numerical index was easy to calculate and to be used in further statistical analyses. However, it contained only about 20% of the original information. Containing the same amount of original information, the ordinal index was much easier to interpret. These two indices summarised information in a unidimensional manner. Instead, the nominal index summarised information in a multidimensional manner, which retained much more information (94%). In the practical example, the three indices showed an antagonistic relationship between

Indexed as

Factor analysisHoney bee healthStress exposureSummarizing big datasetsSynthetic indices

Identifiers

PMID37123927
PMCPMC10133659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.