ReviewHeliyon2023
Disclosure control of machine learning models from trusted research environments (TRE): New challenges and opportunities.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A stakeholder-inclusive conceptual framework for modeling routinely collected health data for therapeutic decision-making illustrated by means of multistate models.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- A maturity model framework for federated networks of trusted research environments.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Are Treatment Services Ready for the Use of Big Data Analytics and AI in Managing Opioid Use Disorder?Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Article
- Are the European reference networks for rare diseases ready to embrace machine learning? A mixed-methods study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Efficacy of federated learning on genomic data: a study on the UK Biobank and the 1000 Genomes Project.Frontiers in big data · 2024Article
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare.Journal of medical ethics · 2023Article
- Streams, rivers and data lakes: an introduction to understanding modern electronic healthcare records.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Machine learning models in trusted research environments - understanding operational risks.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
- Challenges and recommendations for high quality research using electronic health records.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare and medicine have increased in recent years. To enable access to personal data, Trusted Research Environments (TREs) (otherwise known as Safe Havens) provide safe and secure environments in which researchers can access sensitive personal data and develop AI (in particular machine learning (ML)) models. However, currently few TREs support the training of ML models in part due to a gap in the practical decision-making guidance for TREs in handling model disclosure. Specifically, the training of ML models creates a need to disclose new types of outputs from TREs. Although TREs have clear policies for the disclosure of statistical outputs, the extent to which trained models can leak personal training data once released is not well understood. Background: We review, for a general audience, different types of ML models and their applicability within healthcare. We explain the outputs from training a ML model and how trained ML models can be vulnerable to external attacks to discover personal data encoded within the model. Risks: We present the challenges for disclosure control of trained ML models in the context of training and exporting models from TREs. We provide insights and analyse methods that could be introduced within TREs to mitigate the risk of privacy breaches when disclosing trained models. Discussion: Although specific guidelines and policies exist for statistical disclosure controls in TREs, they do not satisfactorily address these new types of output requests; i.e., trained ML models. There is significant potential for new interdisciplinary research opportunities in developing and adapting policies and tools for safely disclosing ML outputs from TREs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.